Id,Age,Gender,"Please provide the name of your area? 

(e.g. Kings Heath, Stirchley, Moseley)","Roughly, what would you say your total household income is per year (before tax)?",Do you have any children under 18 living with you or do you regularly care for children under the age of 18? ,"Do you have any health conditions, disabilities, or access needs that impact the way you travel?","If yes, please briefly describe which modes of transport this impacts and how this impacts your travel?
(e.g. difficulty walking long distances, avoiding crowded transport, etc.)","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).Low-Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs)","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).Introducing or expanding Clean Air Zones (e.g. charging only high-polluting vehicles)","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).Expanding cycling infrastructure (e.g. bike lanes)","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).Opening more local train stations (e.g. Kings Heath, Moseley, Stirchley)","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).Reducing or removing on-street car parking to make space for walking, cycling, or public tra","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).Creating car-free zones (e.g. high streets or school zones)","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).Congestion Charging (e.g applies just for entering certain zones during peak times)","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).School Buses ","What is your opinion of the following local transport and air quality interventions?
(Please rate each one).Public transport to run throughout the night (e.g. 24/7 service or extended hours on the wee",Are there any measures you support or oppose more strongly? could you please specify why (optional),"Based on your experience or general impression, how would you rate the quality of cycling infrastructure (bike lanes, safety, connectivity) in your area? 

(1 star = Very poor, 5 stars = Excellent)","Do you have access to a bicycle?
(This includes owning, borrowing, or using a shared/hire bike)","How often do you cycle?
(This includes commuting, errands, or leisure cycling.)","If you don’t regularly cycle, what are the main reasons? 
(Select all that apply - If 'Other' please specify)
",How do you feel about the following measures to potentially encourage cycling in your local area?.Safer cycling infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes),How do you feel about the following measures to potentially encourage cycling in your local area?.Installing secure public bike parking,How do you feel about the following measures to potentially encourage cycling in your local area?.Creating car-free or low-traffic routes for cycling,How do you feel about the following measures to potentially encourage cycling in your local area?.Heavily subsidise or provide vouchers for buying a bike,How do you feel about the following measures to potentially encourage cycling in your local area?.A 'Bike Bus' (organised group bike ride to school for primary-school children),How do you feel about the following measures to potentially encourage cycling in your local area?.Employers provide an allowance or incentive for those who cycle to work,How do you feel about the following measures to potentially encourage cycling in your local area?.Free cycling skills or safety courses,How do you feel about the following measures to potentially encourage cycling in your local area?.Cycling events or community rides (e.g. monthly or annually),"What would encourage yourself or others to cycle more in your area? 

(You can also share any thoughts on the current system, barriers, or potential changes that could be implemented regarding cycling","Based on your experience or general impression, how would you rate the current bus service in your area?

(1 star = Very poor, 5 stars = Excellent)","When the new train stations in Kings Heath, Moseley, and Stirchley (Pineapple Road) open, how likely are you to use them?","Do you think the new train stations (Kings Heath, Moseley, Stirchley) will help reduce air pollution?",Do you currently utilise public transport in your area? (e.g. Train or Bus),"If you don't regularly use public transport (or plan on in the future), what are the main reasons? 
(Please select all that apply, If other please specify)","Are there any changes that need to be made for you or others to at least consider using public transportation? 


(e.g. frequency, free travel, night service, safety officers, etc)","On a scale of 1 to 5, how would you rate your knowledge of electric vehicles (EVs)?

(1 = No knowledge,      5 = Expert-level knowledge)
",Do you currently own or regularly drive a car?,What type of vehicle do you usually drive?,"If you don’t currently drive a fully electric vehicle, would you consider switching to one in the future?
","If you answered “No” or ""Maybe"", what are your main reasons?

(e.g. cost, infrastructure, driving range)","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.Electric vehicles are a good solution for reducing local air pollution","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.The government should subsidise (reduce the price on) electric vehicles as part of clean air goals","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.Walking, cycling, or public transport are better long-term solutions than switching to electric vehicles","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.Owning an electric vehicle is seen as a status symbol ","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.The focus on EVs distracts from the need to reduce overall car dependency","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.Public transport, walking, and cycling should be prioritised over encouraging more car use, even if they are electric","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.I worry about the environmental impact of producing electric vehicle batteries","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.More electric vehicles on the road would make my local area feel cleaner and quieter","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.Electric vehicles are mainly for people who are more concerned about the environment","To what extent do you agree with the following about electric vehicles (EVs):
.The Clean Air Zone encourages me to buy an electric car","On a scale of 1 to 5, how concerned are you about air pollution in your local area?

(1 = Not at all concerned,     5 = Extremely concerned)","Most of these interventions aim to reduce air pollution. 

What level of pollution reduction would make each one feel worthwhile or acceptable to you?
.Low-Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs)","Most of these interventions aim to reduce air pollution. 

What level of pollution reduction would make each one feel worthwhile or acceptable to you?
.Clean Air Zones (e.g. charging only high-polluti","Most of these interventions aim to reduce air pollution. 

What level of pollution reduction would make each one feel worthwhile or acceptable to you?
.Car-free zones (e.g. high streets or school zone","Most of these interventions aim to reduce air pollution. 

What level of pollution reduction would make each one feel worthwhile or acceptable to you?
.Congestion Charging (e.g applies just for enteri",To what extent do you feel personally responsible for helping to reduce air pollution in your local area?,To what extent do you agree with the following:.People should not smoke near schools in order to protect children's health,To what extent do you agree with the following:.People should avoid driving near schools to help protect children's health,To what extent do you agree with the following:.Poor air quality is a serious health risk ,"To what extent do you agree with the following:.In my area, drivers are treated with more respect than cyclists or pedestrians","To what extent do you agree with the following:.People who walk, cycle, or use public transport are often seen as doing so out of necessity, not choice",To what extent do you agree with the following:.Driving is the most normal and socially accepted way to get around where I live,To what extent do you agree with the following:.Cyclists are often seen as a danger on the road,To what extent do you agree with the following:.Cars are often seen as a danger on the road,To what extent do you agree with the following:.I am concerned about damage to my health from exhaust fumes,To what extent do you agree with the following:.Low emission zones (LEZ) are mostly there to make money,"To what extent do you agree with the following:.Everyone should reduce how much they use their motor vehicles in urban areas, for the sake of public health","Are there any changes you would like to see in your local area to help reduce air pollution and encourage more people to use sustainable forms of transportation?

(e.g. better cycling infrastructure, "
2,18-24,Male,Stirchley,"Up to £14,999",No,No,,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,I strongly oppose the expansion of clean air zones as it is a prime example of the Polluter Pays Principle which is flawed as it punishes lower income families with incompatible vehicles to an extent far more significantly than other socio demographic groups ,4,No,I never cycle,I prefer to walk or run ;,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,If more people participated in cycling and it was more normalised ,4,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",Unreliable;,They need to be more reliable (eg on time and have more frequent services) ,3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,4,10–20% reduction would make this feel reasonable ,10–20% reduction would make this feel reasonable ,10–20% reduction would make this feel reasonable ,10–20% reduction would make this feel reasonable ,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,"More frequent services, less delays and cheaper price. "
4,18-24,Female,Kings Heath,"Up to £14,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,1,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Social stigma;,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,More designated lanes off the road ,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"I think cheaper fares, more frequent, safety officers and more to be done to reduce those who do not pay tickets or park in bus lanes etc - overall need to reduce anti social behaviour and improve all buses to electric ",2,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,4,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,
5,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,All roads need to stay open... as public transport is improved. So that buses and cars can move freely and less congestion. Then buses need to be free or a lot cheaper to incentivise people to use them. The carrot approach not the stick. Which is highly divisive in communities and not effective anyway. ,4,Yes,A few times a month,I don't want to cycle all the time. My choice.;,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,"People already cycle if they want to. We don't need to be bombarded with cycling propaganda. Your questionnaire is very loaded and pro - bike. Lots of people don't want to cycle, we have a lot of rain in this country and 'active travel' is an agenda which has sinister origins and not fair to people who have disabilities and are not able to cycle, lack confidence or just plain do not want to cycle. Freedom of choice. ",3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,LTNs slow buses down. ;,"As already answered, LTNs slow buses down. Needs to be cheaper and free to incentivise. Carrot approach to encourage public transport. Also kept very clean and safe. ",4,Yes,Petrol,No,"Not safe, hydrogen will be a better option. Not green, they use far too many rare earth minerals, the mining is environmentally destructive and uses child labour. As an environmentalist I'm very concerned that EVs are being pushed, massive ones too, they are not remotely 'green'. ",Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,1,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,"As already said, ban LTNs and low emission zones and improve public transport first and make it really cheap. Fed up of the anti car agenda. People have complicated lives, children, elderly parents, work... and you can't expect people to do it all on bikes and buses."
6,18-24,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,1,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;I live too far away from where I need to get to;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Designated bike lanes and/ or improved pavements - a lot of them are too bumpy or are made of cracked uneven slabs that deter me from biking,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"Cheaper travel, night services, making it more obvious that there is cctv surveillance, taking a bigger stance against harassment on public transport from the council ",2,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,5,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,"Better cycling infrastructure, cheaper public transport, safer bus initiatives"
7,55-64,Male,Moseley ,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"I strongly oppose LTNs they don’t reduce traffic they merely displace. They face divided our once united community. We need a big solution to a national problem, not some road blocks in B14",3,Yes,A few times a year,I dislike cycling.;,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,I don’t like cycling. Nothing. Happy for others ti cycle and be respected on the roads as a bare minimum ,4,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Cheaper ,5,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,"Local solutions to national problems don’t work. Use higher VED on second, third and fourth household cars to reduce use and therefore emissions. The LTNs have been and continue to be divisive. In consultations the majority say no and are ignored, they are told they don’t understand. Current councillors are deaf. The potential outcomes very worrying. "
8,18-24,Female,Moseley,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Low traffic bollards don’t work and I strongly oppose because it just pushes traffic into a more concentrated space (eg back of Moseley onto the kings heath high street) ,3,Yes,I never cycle,Concern about safety;,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Cycling lanes? ,3,Very likely,Yes,Rarely ,Driving more convenient and faster but a train station in Moseley will make it quicker ;,Be quicker than driving ,5,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,"- open train station 

"
9,45-54,Female,Moseley,"Up to £14,999",Yes,Yes,"Can't do bus cus 2 noisy. Train not built yet, so I get taxi ",Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,,1,No,,Health or mobility issues;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Electric bike,3,Somewhat likely,Yes,Rarely ,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Too Crowded;Noise;,Make quiet bus area,5,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,5,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,"Mek bus quiet zone, giv benefit 4 using electric car. Disability access 2 new train. Mek mor area of moslie car 3 like kings heef. Electric bike access. "
10,35-44,Female,Stirchley,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,Yes,Sometimes difficulty walking,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Cycling lanes and how they're planned with bus stops. To help cycling and buses. Cheaper buses and trains would also be good!,3,Yes,Once a week,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Knowledge of where safe bike racks are. ,4,Somewhat likely,No,"Yes, regularly",,Cheaper.,3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,"Workplaces need to penalise driving more, especially when there is good public transport (Mondelez)"
11,55-64,Female,Kings Heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,1,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;It’s too hilly in my area;Health or mobility issues;,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Cycle lanes,1,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Unreliable;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Frequency and safety ,2,No,,,,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,No
12,55-64,Male,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Strongly oppose the introduction of anymore LTN’s as the existing ones only concentrate the traffic to other roads, doing absolutely nothing for reducing overall emissions.",3,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Health or mobility issues;,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Make certain roads cycling only on weekends only.,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Unreliable;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Not practical for my travel;,"Buses unreliable at times ,sometimes not turning up at all.Information on the digital bus stops not up to date.They don’t inform you if a bus is has been removed from service or is not turning up at all.",4,Yes,Diesel,No,"They don’t have the range that manufacturers say once you start putting them under load.You cannot tell the true condition of the batteries if you buy second hand. The co2 emissions are far higher on the production of ev vehicles than petrol/ diesel vehicles.
 
 ",Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,More reliable and cheaper public transport.
13,75 and older,Female,Stirchley,"Up to £14,999",No,Yes,Difficulty walking & balance problems,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,people using blue badge spaces without a blue badge,3,No,,Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Not sure as i am not able to ride a bike,2,Neither likely nor unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Unreliable;Accessibility concerns;,I use a car,1,Yes,Petrol,No,Cost & to quiet as you can not hear them coming,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,"better public transport, more affordable. better street parking for disabled "
14,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,Yes,I can’t drive due to disability so living in Brum with kids is really hard.,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,2,Yes,A few times a month,"Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Infrastructure - the streets are utterly dominated by cars, every cycle trip could potentially end in a collision due to unsafe driving ",2,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"It’s expensive, especially with kids to pay for too. Also can be unsafe/antisocial behaviour on board. ",2,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"Cycle paths on all the main roads, LTNs for residential, school streets "
15,25-34,Male,Stirchley ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,2,Yes,Once a week,None of these;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,"Personally, what hinders me to cycle more in Birmingham is not only because of the lack in infrastructure. Many areas around Birmingham are just too hilly to cycle around.",1,Neither likely nor unlikely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"1. Bus. The bus service in West Midlands are terrible for their continuous delays, expensive price cap, and the vehicles’ cleanliness. A dedicated bus-lane for popular routes would help to reduce congestion and delay. Additionally, bus operators would need to clean their vehicles more regularly to get rid of the lingering weed’s smell. 

2. Train. The train service is considerably better since the new train sets came in service in 2024. However, WM Trains would still need to maintain the quality of the cleanliness with regular deep cleaning. Additionally, the zoning system for railways is a good start to begin with but the operator could do better with the pricing and payment system (e.g., apply the Swiftcard payment for all routes across WM).

3. Tram. The service is good with minimal delay and disruption. But for a service with just one line, the price is somewhat too expensive.

Overall, Transport for West Midlands as a body that oversees public transport in the region should be able to implement better pricing and payment system. E.g., implementing Swiftcard’s pricing cap to all modes of transport (currently only available for bus and tram), and reforming the zoning regulations into more London-like systems.",3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,4,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,"I reckon public transport around Birmingham and the West Midlands isn’t too bad, but it could be better if it was actually run for people rather than for profit. At the moment, all the buses and trains are run by private operators, so they don’t always put what’s best for locals or the environment first. TfWM is a designated entity to oversee the operation and advise the Mayor on public transport’s policy, but they haven’t really got any proper power to change how stuff is run.

If TfWM had a bit more control, they could sort out fares and make tickets cheaper and a lot simpler, it would definitely get more people to use public transport instead of driving everywhere. Cheaper, cleaner, more reliable public transport (and maybe more protected bike lanes like on Bristol Rd) would be good for cutting air pollution too."
16,55-64,Female,Stirchley ,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"Find blocking some roads at the expense of others is wrong, also they should not be promoted as child safe",3,No,,It’s too hilly in my area;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Better roads,4,Neither likely nor unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Unreliable;,Cheaper,3,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,"Cost, do very few miles so not cost effective ",Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,4,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Not sure,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree, Cheaper more reliable public transport
17,18-24,Male,Stirchley  ,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,I strongly oppose clean air zones as they unfairly punish poorer members of society who cannot afford a vehicle compatible with the clean air zone requirements    ,4,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)",I never cycle,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,More people participating in it ,4,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Less delays ,3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,4,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Reduce traffic near schools at pick up time - a solution could be to create a school bus network at a subsidised cost  
18,18-24,Male,Kings heath ,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,Yes,A few times a year,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Financial Incentives from work places/council,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Night service,2,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,1,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Cheaper and more regular public transport 
19,45-54,Female,Stirchley ,"£15,000 to £34,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,LTNs are divisive and have allowed some people to live in culdesacs and others now live on constantly busy streets with idling traffic all day. I’m really very opposed to how awfully this has been done and how residents were not listened to. There are plans now to close priory road because of the dangerous driving and parking by camp hill parents - they need to deal with the behaviour - not close access for everyone. This will push traffic onto pineapple and vicarage and cartland and also to the dangerous junctions surrounding these.,3,Yes,A few times a year,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;It’s too hilly in my area;",Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,"Cycling instead of driving means changing at work, not being able to give lifts or carry goods, and it adds an hour to my working day. It’s just not very practical. ",3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;They don’t go in the right direction - I do use the train to go into the city centre and used to use itt ty daily when I walked there. I MUCH prefer trains to buses. ;,I don’t travel on the train ar night - don’t feel safe. ,1,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cost - and I don’t really think dumping a perfectly good car for an electric one is good for the environment atall.,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,4,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,"I think that people without cars think that they are better than everyone else. I don’t think people’s lives are designed now to cope without cars, we needed to get to too many places and too quickly. I walk when I can, and I always walked on my school runs when the children were young, but I was able to negotiate changing work hours to do this (and less pay because of it!!!) it’s very rare for people to be able to do that. "
20,65-74,Male,Stirchley ,"More than £80,000",Yes,Yes,Condition impacted by cycling.,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Would support cycle free pedestrian areas such as pavements as have had several near misses with cyclists on pavements.,5,No,,"Health or mobility issues;I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;It’s too hilly in my area;",Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,"Nothing, but would walk more if the problem of cycling on pavements was addressed.",3,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Free travel.  I hardly used public transport before I got my free pass.,5,Yes,Hybrid ,Maybe,"Cost of vehicle, lack of range/charging infrastructure, slowness of charging.  As someone who has reduced the mileage I do the vehicle cost makes it not viable.",Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,20mph zones cause more local pollution because non hybrid car are very inefficient at that speed.  These should be scaled back on main roads to shopping areas etc.
21,55-64,Male,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly oppose the LTNs and BCC anti car agenda when we dont have the public infrastructure in Birmingham to travel across the city in a timely and cost effective manner. ,4,No,,Concern about safety;Poor Weather;Security. Alot of thefts of bikes and owners attacked. ;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"More safety, security for bike owners from attack/theft. ",3,Somewhat unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Cost is biggest factor. West Midlands buses have put ticket prices up significantly which is making me consider using my car more. ,4,Yes,Petrol,No,"Costs and not environmentally friendly as the government make us believe. Also the inconvenience of having to stop and charge on long journeys, especially when we dont have the infrastructure in the UK for the masses to switch to electric. ",Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,3,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,
22,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,Yes,Difficulty walking long distances ,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,A few times a month,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Organisation ,4,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Never,Unreliable;Not practical for my travel;Costs too much;,Reliability,3,Yes,Electric,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,
23,45-54,Female,Moseley,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,No,,"Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;",Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,I do not feel confident or safe on a bike and would not want to cycle anywhere.  I would think safer road and wider cycle lanes would encourage others,3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;,"I rarely drive to work because a 20 minute car journey takes over an hour on the buses.  I get the train from Selly Oak into town when shopping,  free park and ride is great",2,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Not very responsible ,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Cheaper public transport
24,25-34,Female,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Cycling infrastructure is essential - Birmingham is so unsafe to cycle in at present. I feel that resident-only parking would be helpful in Kings Heath, but what is really needed in policing/enforcement of current measures to prevent antisocial vehicle use (eg parking on pavements, parking on double yellows, speeding, drug driving)",2,Yes,A few times a month,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Poor Weather;Absence of storage facilities and showering facilities at work;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,"Cleaner roads (less debris/broken glass at edges of roads), safer cycling routes, enforcement of parking restrictions and speed limits. I also need storage facilities and showering/changing facilities in my workplace ",3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Buses are dirty and unreliable. Buses are needed later into the night. Safety officers may be helpful. ,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,"Driving range, ability to charge ",Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,
25,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"Very in favour of anything that discourages driving actively rather than just making other options easier, most people won't give up cars without being seriously inconvenienced",1,No,,I never learned to ride a bike;,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Cycling will never be safe with cars on the road ,4,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"Public transport is fast, safe and easy. It's only really laziness that stops people using it ",1,No,,,,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,"Higher taxes and prices on cars, petrol etc, to discourage use"
26,45-54,Male,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,I think it’s really good that the rail line from Kings Heath and Moseley into the city centre will be opening again. It offers an additional affordable means of getting into the city from these suburbs without using the roads. ,3,No,,Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;I haven’t used a bike since childhood and just can’t imagine starting now. ;,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Being younger and fitter!,4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;,"Attitude changes. Not for me, but I think some people just won’t use public transport, which I think is ridiculous. ",2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,4,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,I think the obvious move is the reopening of the railway stations which thankfully is happening. 
27,35-44,Male,Moseley,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,We need a national ban on pavement parking and taxation based on vehicle size/weight. ,2,Yes,A few times a week,None of these;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Dedicated safe cycle lanes with physical separation from vehicular traffic. Not painted cycle lanes. We need a large network of cycle lanes that will allow you to move across the city door to door. ,2,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"We need an end to separate bus companies competing against each other. The buses should be brought back into public ownership and a single travel card allow you to travel on any WMCA bus, train, scooter, bike etc. A system akin to TfL. ",5,Yes,Electric,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"School streets closing streets bear schools to vehicular traffic. School buses paid for by school parents which plot a route based on parental need to reduce the number of cars in the morning. 
Segregated cycling infrastructure. 
A ban on the sale of SUVs and heavy taxation for unnecessarily large, dangerous and polluting vehicles.  "
28,55-64,Male,Kings Heath ,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,1,Yes,A few times a week,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Safe routes that are segregated. This is the key measure to increase cycling. ,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Increased reliability ,2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Reduce car usage for short journeys and improve alternatives (public transportation and cycling)
29,55-64,Female,Kings Heath ,Prefer not to say,Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,A few times a year,Concern about safety;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,More police to stop speeding cars,4,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Safety officers especially in the evenings ,5,Yes,Electric,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Better policing to make roads safer 
30,55-64,Female,Kings heath,Prefer not to say,No,Yes,Arthritis and heart problems! Restricts walking too far,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Oppose anymore LTN! Reduce what we've got!!!!,4,No,,Health or mobility issues;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Plenty of cycle lanes already!! Maybe reduce speed limits for all!! ,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,have an up-to-date app with true times,3,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Expense,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,4,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Not sure,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Less LTN. Better public transport
31,55-64,Female,Kings Heath ,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"I oppose the LTN as it is at the moment, it’s just moving the problem not resolving it.",2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,More safety for cyclists.,4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Safety officials.,1,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cost,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,5,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Reduced traffic near schools. More safety measures (including more police) to ensure safety.
32,65-74,Male,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,Yes,I am unable to use public transport or cycle.,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,,5,No,,Unable to use a cycle;,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,I do not know.,1,Very unlikely,No,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel;Costs too much;Unreliable;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,I would not consider using public transport due to health issues.,4,Yes,Diesel,No,Too expensive and polluting to point of sale.,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,"You will only convince people to use public transport by having adequate, cheap and reliable public transport in place."
33,45-54,Female,Kings Heath ,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Permit parking might reduce illegally parked cars all over the place. ,1,Yes,Almost every day,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Cycle everyday scared for my life and my sons everyday on Birmingham roads ,1,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Routes don’t work for me ;,Make it cheaper. Cleaner buses … more electric buses ,3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"I have lived in other part of the uk and find drivers in Birmingham rude, disrespectful and very dangerous.  People park anywhere no consequences no police no tickets. Making me considering moving as don’t feel safe. "
34,35-44,Female,Stirchley ,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,Yes,Journeys and travel can increase anxiety or cause fatigue,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,2,Yes,A few times a year,"Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Poor Weather;Concern about safety;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;Parts of the River Rea route are unlit at night, I don't feel safe due to this as it's my commute into the office;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Training to build confidence and learn to ride. Joined up high quality infrastructure. Slowing down speed limits,3,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"Services that go across the city, a more joined up exps and frequency of public transport ",2,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,
35,55-64,Male,Kings heath,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,I strongly support Car free zones around schools and proper punishment for the drivers who do not follow the rules when parking around schools.  Cctv and automatic reporting of offenders to Next base rather than relying on school staff to enforce the rules,2,Yes,A few times a year,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;Concern about safety;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Secure bike parking,4,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Costs too much;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Safety officers would be great as long as they had powers to act,3,Yes,Hybrid ,Maybe,Range anxiety and charging infrastructure,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,All the above
36,25-34,Female,Stirchley ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Living in Birmingham the reason there are so many cars is because public transport is too expensive/ not reliable enough. We used to have trains running every 10 mins and now we don’t, the buses are pretty bad. The low traffic neighbourhoods I don’t agree with as how is it okay that some streets can have this privilege whilst most of us can’t. It just creates more traffic in the places where cars are allowed. I understand having clean air zones in town as there are options to get there. But getting around and popping to supermarket etc or doing little jobs a car is often needed. You can’t even park anywhere in kings heath now on the high street, not helpful for those who are less able ",2,No,,"To be honest, it’ll probably get stolen;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"I think having more cycle lanes, switching on the speed cameras as well ",2,Somewhat likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Costs too much;Unreliable;,Just trains running more often ,4,Yes,Petrol,No,No infrastructure. Money could be used elsewhere. It’s a real not reality arm. It’s worse for the environment to be sourcing the batteries for the cars ,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,2,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,I can understand wanting to make schools a car free zone but not high streets 
37,55-64,Male,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,Yes,"Asthma, high blood pressure",Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,"As people (car drivers) steadfastly refuse to leave their cars at home for short journeys then I strongly believe that expanding the current LTN is unwise.
The current gridlock on the High St and Vicarage Rd during peak hours and at weekends is unsustainable.",3,Yes,Almost every day,,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,More visible intervention and protection for vulnerable road users. More pro active enforcement of cyclists who choose to ignore road markings and signage.,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"The LTN has caused increased congestion which means during peak hours it's quicker to walk from where Kings Heath Station will be, to where I live (B14 6TT) during peak hours. The walk takes 30 mins.",3,Yes,Diesel,No,Poor infrastructure and initial cost is prohibitive.,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,4,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Regular updates on pollution levels in my local community. Better enforcement of cycle/bus only lanes. 
38,25-34,Female,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,On street car parking is a serious risk to all road users. I don’t feel safe using buses in this area due to other bus users behaviour/ characteristics ,1,No,,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Less cars on the road,4,Very likely,Yes,Never,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Too slow compared to other modes ;,"I wouldn’t get a bus, a dedicated safety officer on every bus might help encourage me but it’s not likely to happen/ be feasible ",5,Yes,Electric,,,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"I think the messaging could be improved to better resonate with people to adapt behaviour, I.e show it’s cheaper or faster to use another mode or the health benefits of doing so"
39,35-44,Male,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Strongly oppose the clean air zone as the additional slow moving traffic on the ring road means a net increase in pollution overall and particularly in deprived areas around the ring road which people wouldn't have gone anywhere near if it wasn't for the CAZ

Oppose the LTN (apart from York road pedestrianisation which is great)
The other street closures are delivering marginal benefits to a small number of people while impacting everyone who lives, works, socialises, visits or just passes through the area 

Where are people supposed to park if they take all the on street parking away? 
Congestion pricing is a joke in the current cost of living / hospitality crisis 

In favour of any improvements to public transport ",2,Yes,A few times a month,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Bike theft;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"Secure bike storage
Flexible working so I could take kids to school and nursery at their own pace 
Protected cycle lanes, with enforcement - Ladypool road is a joke
Enforcing speed limits / penalising dangerous driving ",4,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"Should have put another entrance to Moseley station on Woodbridge road 
Frequency of trains, if it's 2x an hour I can't 
catch it to work after dropping off at nursery ",4,Yes,Hybrid ,Maybe,Range and availability of chargers,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,"Free public transport 
More electric scooter bays"
40,25-34,Female,Kings heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,,3,No,,I live too far away from where I need to get to;,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Nothing ,3,Neither likely nor unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Less cancellations and more frequency ,1,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cost and range ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,
42,35-44,Male,Stirchley  ,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Police presence to enforce better safety for cyclists (they did an operation on Hayley road a few years ago and caught out a load of dangerous drivers), I find the roads too unsafe to cycle.

Reduced bus fares. Public ownership of public transport.

Better safety on buses.",2,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"Connecting up cycle infrastructure - bike lanes just stop and most routes in Birmingham require going down main roads which is scary, and smaller side roads often have low quality surfaces.

Public awareness and driver education.",3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"Frequency is usually ok, cost is getting prohibitive - for two adults it's almost cheaper to get an Uber plus a lot more convenient. ",3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,"Any measures to reduce the number of vehicles during rush hour - encouraging WFH or flexible working hours (UoB used to be hybrid but they're requiring more on-campus working now for example).

Public ownership of buses and reduced fares - London and Manchester work a lot better than Birmingham.

Police enforcement to make the roads safer - I've never seen anyone drive at 20 mph down Russell road despite the speed limit. "
43,45-54,Male,Stirchley ,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,LTN’s cause more traffic pollution by moving it elsewhere,3,No,,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;",Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Safety,2,Neither likely nor unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Worried about accidents or breakdowns;Unreliable;Too Crowded;Not practical for my travel;,Safety ,5,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,3,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,I don’t have an issue with day to day cyclists; they will normally adhere to road signs and traffic light systems.  The issue I have are the food order companies using ridiculously fast electric cycles (breaking the law). They also go through red lights continuously and go down no entry streets and go the wrong way down one way streets. These riders need a licence and training because they are dangerous to pedestrians and to themselves with dodging cars. 
44,35-44,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,3,No,,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Bike storage issues;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Great speed limits or speed restrictions for cars on the road at the same time. ,3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Bus journey times improved by reducing volumes of traffic through main travel routes. ,3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,5,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,"Construction times on the new stations reduced. How long has it taken so far and at what cost? How far over the original completion date have they now gone over by?  

Schools better equipped to patrol the surrounding areas. There is no room in already limited budgets to do so currently and the lack of volunteers to enforce no parking zones makes any attempts to enforce change very hard. "
45,45-54,Male,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Reduce traffic ,4,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Cross city routes,3,Yes,Diesel,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Proceed with Phase 2 of the LTN
46,45-54,Female,Kings heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,,3,No,,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;I live too far away from where I need to get to;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Safer streets with less idiot drivers ,4,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Costs too much;,"Having two small children, it is often easier and cheaper to just get a taxi if travelling locally. Bus fare into town for a family of four is roughly the same as a taxi and far quicker. We opt to travel by bus when we have time for the sake of one less car, but realistically the price similarity makes it easy to opt for the faster, more convenient option. We absolutely plan to use the train when it opens. ",3,Yes,Diesel,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,"I'd like to see less traffic near schools. Valentine road by Kings heath primary is particularly bad - you can taste the pollution. Cheaper public transport would incentivise use although sadly convenience is king for busy families. The train station opening will be a huge step forward, but I think the roads around it will be more congested with parked cars. "
47,25-34,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,No,,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;The cost of a suitable bicycle;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,I think safety is definitely a huge factor as more and more bikes are being robbed. I’m far less scared of cars knocking me down than somebody stealing my bike from me. ,4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Unreliable;,"As a woman, I feel like there needs to be more safety officers on public transport especially after 6/7pm. I have experienced such high levels of harassment that I have now learnt to drive to avoid walking/biking or taking public transport. I feel like this is a important point that needs to be taken into consideration by planning officers - women’s safety on roads.",3,No,,,,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,3,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"If there is cheaper public transport and more support for women’s safety, I would definitely walk and cycle more."
48,35-44,Female,Kings Heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,,1,Yes,A few times a week,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Work less so more free time ,5,Neither likely nor unlikely,No,Never,Too Crowded;Not practical for my travel;,No,1,Yes,Diesel,No,A pain to charge the battery 🔋 ,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,
49,55-64,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,Yes,"Unable to walk too far, or carry heavy shopping too far.",Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Better/cleaner public transport, safer public transport.  Closer bus stops to side roads away from main roads.  My closest bus stop is a good 15-20 minute walk.  I would be scared to walk that far after getting off a bus at night.",3,No,,Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;It’s too hilly in my area;Thieves while out cycling;,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Not sure, as I see many people cycling already.  I would not consider cycling  on my own, I would not be able to pedal far or carry my weekly shopping.",2,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Costs too much;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Bus stops too far away;,"Closer bus stops, free or cheaper travel, night service, safety officers, better routes.  I want to be able to travel to more places than just on the number 50 or 35 to the city centre.  I want a better choice not having to make do.",1,Yes,Petrol,No,Cost,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,5,Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Very responsible ,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,"I cannot comment on changes. But - LTNs only benefit people who are on the LTN designated roads.  I get extra traffic on my road which used to be quiet and now it has become a rat run and I actually get more chest infections because of it.  In addition, I do not agree with charging people congestion charges etc as they just pay the mone and still pollute, so what is the point?"
50,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,3,No,,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;",Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,.,2,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Unreliable;Not practical for my travel;,Reliability and frequency ,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cost,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,3,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
51,35-44,Female,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,LTN awful . Instead of blocking roads bake them one way . I would never cycle in BHX to dengerus ,1,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Nothing to many bad drivers in Birmingham and u cans do weekly shopping on the bike ,4,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,N/a,5,Yes,Electric,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,3,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,"One way streets , electric cars "
52,65-74,Male,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,"LTNs simply move a problem to somewhere else, rather than mitigating or eliminating it.",2,Yes,I never cycle,Concern about safety;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Nothing - the roads were never designed to accommodate both cyclists and motorists and all the poor modifications already made in Birmingham are too costly and disruptive. Cyclists seem incapable of sharing.,2,Very likely,No,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel;Unreliable;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Safety officers with guts to carry out their role.,5,Yes,Petrol,No,"Too expensive, high depreciation, cost of battery replacement, inconvenience of charging stations.",Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not sure,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Better measurement of pollution levels before and after the introduction of initiatives that are politically motivated. LTNs have been introduced without credible research or evidence or local majority support.
53,35-44,Female,Kings Heath ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,School buses would be very useful as parent parking around some schools is absolutely ridiculous. Perhaps if there were dedicated buses for individual schools parents would feel their children would be safer compared to using public transport which can feel unsafe at times.,3,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore","I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;",Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Its tricky for me as i have a dog who comes everywhere with me and we also have no direct access to our garden so getting bikes in and out isnt quick or easy ,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Better routes which join areas of Birmingham more easily rather than all going towards the city center ,4,Yes,Electric,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"Better bus services (more frequent, more routes connecting suburbs), less traffic near schools"
54,45-54,Male,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,There’s plenty of space in the area to create safer infrastructure for cycling/scooting/walking. The roads are too dangerous for most people to use them for active travel at the moment.,1,Yes,A few times a week,"Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,"Being safe from dangerous drivers- proper segregation and better enforcement of taking drivers who speed, jump red lights, drink/take drugs and use mobile phones off the road. ",3,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Reliability and safety- stopping ASB on buses.,4,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,All the things already mentioned 
55,55-64,Female,Stirchley,"Up to £14,999",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,No,4,No,,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;",Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,No,4,Neither likely nor unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Costs too much;,No,3,Yes,Petrol,No,No,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,1,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,No
56,35-44,Female,Kings Heath,Prefer not to say,Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,1,Yes,A few times a year,Concern about safety;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"LTN in Kings Heath has created chaos and all the drivers, including buses are stranded on two main roads, become frustrated, are always in a rush and thus lack the patience for other fellow drivers/cyclists/members of public. The theft of bikes in the area has increased in the past few years, with no deterrent to the offenders. So, no, i wouldn't put my life or my child's life at risk until strict measurements are put in place. ",3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"The bus frequency needs to be regulated. It states on the route that there is a bust every 4 minutes, but in fact there are 4 or more buses at a time, then it takes 20 to 30 minutes for the next one to come. Safety in buses is also a big problem, mainly for single women who travel in the early or late hours.",1,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,5,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,"First and foremost get rid of the LTN. Apart from one street, York Road, no one uses the other closed streets. The cyclist do not take a detour on the closed roads, the use the same cramped roads as the cars, so why were they put in place? "
57,45-54,Male,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,"Until a strong and integrated public transport system is in place, and priced to allow people to travel as a family cheaper than it would be by car, anti-car measures (removing parking, car free zones, congestion charging) would be self-defeating as people wouldn't be able to travel easily and green measures would lose public support with obvious political costs.",1,No,,"Concern about safety;I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Poor Weather;",Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Travelling by bike is often an individual activity, but which becomes difficult as a family and over longer distances without a safe infrastructure.  Any solution must be integrated.",3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,"Not practical for my travel;Costs too much;Unreliable;The ability to get easily to where I need to, especially as a family, and without paying a significant premium over going be car, which public transport does unfortunately bring.  A public transport system must be integrated, cheap, and easy not unlike those in some European cities.  I currently only use public transport to go to town as that is easy, otherwise I don't.;","Frequency, much cheaper cost especially for families, integration and ease to get to where we need.  It must become cheaper and easier to get to where we want to by public transport, than it is by car.",2,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,"All of the above: cost, driving range, infrastructure/recharging ability as my house is far from the roadside and with no driveway.",Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,4,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,"Car use will not decline without a strong, integrated, very cheap, and easy public transport system, especially when compared to taking a family by car.

LTN's, local congestion charging, etc will backfire if people are not able to get to where they want otherwise...they will be seen as another tax which during our cost of living crisis will not be helpful.

Working from home will need to be further encouraged where possible, with associated measures to support, to encourage a transition to sustainable forms of public transportation.  Often the school run is done by car as it is a stop on the way to work...these things need to be considered.

Our powers-that-be need to do some joined-up thinking: identify every variable and then plan for it economically.  This isn't just a geographical/built environment issue...it would need to be paid for too."
58,25-34,Male,Moseley,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,cycle lanes.. i want,1,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,safe drivers and better infrastructure,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,no,5,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,"infrastruture to charge and gov subsidy, ",Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,1,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,mentioned previously
60,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,"The LTN has had a really detrimental effect on Howard Road with a significant increase in traffic.  The traffic queue by Colmore School Junior playground and classrooms on that side of the school surely has an impact on pollution levels.  The frontage of our properties are marked by the additional pollution, inside and out.  Black dust is obvious within the house, especially the hard white areas in the bathroom.  It can be challenging to cross the road at times when I walk into Kings Heath and to get out of our drive to join the traffic stream.  In addition to this, is the appalling parental parking for Colmore and Camp Hill schools.  Elderly or disabled residents have to drive further if they need to drive to access services or amenities in Kings Heath and friends who live in the roads which have access to Howard Road blocked off are unhappy as they have to drive further to travel south towards the Maypole.",1,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,"I feel I have seen a reduction in cycling in the area since the LTN, certainly in my area and walking routes.  The increase in traffic has increased the number of bikes ridden on the pavement as the road is too crowded.  Cyclists do not seem to appreciate that if the pedestrian has any hearing loss then a bike shooting past them totally unexpectedly from behind often very close, feels threatening.  As a result, I walk into Kings Heath less often.",5,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Unreliable;Takes too long to get somewhere and needs bus changes.;,"No, unless I'm going into the city centre, they are rarely convenient and limit what I can carry.",3,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,"Cost, driving range and infrastructure and reliability.  ",Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,"I think it will be really challenging to put the genie back in the bottle.  Modern family lifestyle pressures can be a barrier to removing cars.  In many families, both parents work and children cannot be walked to school or until a certain age left at home to walk themselves to school.  Commuting by public transport to my job on the east side of the city would have added at least three hours to my working day and I would not want to live in that area or have had my child attend a school there.  I also needed efficient transport to attend meetings in other establishments during the day.  "
61,55-64,Female,Kings heath ,"Up to £14,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,,2,Yes,Once a week,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Safe spaces ,3,Somewhat unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Reduce traffic congestion. Cheaper single tickets ,2,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,4,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
62,35-44,Male,Stirchley,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,A few times a week,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,More cycle lanes and enforcement of traffic laws against drivers who speed/close pass,3,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,More regular late evening buses,2,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Not very responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,
63,55-64,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,,3,No,,Concern about safety;,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Nothing,4,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Cost,1,Yes,Diesel,No,Cost,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,1,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,No
64,45-54,Male,Stirchley ,Prefer not to say,Prefer not to say,Prefer not to say,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,,3,Yes,A few times a week,I am able to walk;,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Nothing ,3,Neither likely nor unlikely,No,Rarely ,Unreliable;,Make it reliable,4,No,,,,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,1,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,No
65,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,Yes,Ankle/knee/back issues which can impact mobility. Asthma. Immunocompromised so often need to avoid crowded and enclosed spaces,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"LTNs don't take account of those people who are unable to walk/cycle/take public transport everywhere either due to mobility, illness, time or other commitments. If you are a fit and healthy person who doesn't need to leave a relatively small local area for any reason and only needs to get places at sociable hours, without any time constraints then potentially they work for you. For everyone else, not so much",2,No,,"Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Health or mobility issues;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;",Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Nothing. If something isn't local enough to be able to walk to then I'd more likely go to a significantly further away location in a car,4,Somewhat unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;,"More buses that go ""across"" (ie east/west) rather than needing to go into the city centre and back out again",4,Yes,Hybrid ,Maybe,Current range on sensibly priced vehicles. Infrastructure for charging away from home,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Implement more ideas like walking buses for getting kids to school - there's not many kids that NEED to be dropped off by car directly outside their school. Encourage older children to make their own way to school - the number of 15 and 16 year old that have to be taken everywhere by their parents is frankly astonishing 
66,25-34,Male,Stirchley ,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"I strongly support expanding local train stations and cycling infrastructure, as well as providing school buses and extended public transport hours. These interventions improve connectivity, offer realistic alternatives to car dependency, and support working families and local communities without imposing punitive costs.

I somewhat support Clean Air Zones and car-free zones, but only if paired with better public transport and exemptions for essential workers, tradespeople, and low-income households. Environmental goals are important, but policies must be fair and avoid penalising those who rely on older vehicles through no fault of their own.

I somewhat oppose reducing or removing on-street parking without clear alternatives. While reallocation of space may benefit active travel, it must be done with local consultation and without undermining residents, disabled drivers, or small businesses.

I strongly oppose congestion charges in their current form, they often disproportionately impact working people while doing little to fix structural transport problems. We should be investing in infrastructure first, not taxing people into submission.",2,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)","I used to cycle, but not anymore","I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;",Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,"Not currently, there are major safety concerns across the Pershore road and I believe the level or driving has significantly decreased over the past few years to where it is now dangerous ",4,Neither likely nor unlikely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"Yes. For public transport to be a viable option for more people, including myself, it needs to be reliable, safe, and genuinely convenient. That means:

Increased frequency and expanded routes, especially across suburbs and estates where options are currently limited or non-existent.

Affordable or free travel for low-income groups, key workers, and students to ensure no one is priced out of mobility.

Night services, people don’t stop living or working at 11pm. Hospitality, shift workers, and emergency staff deserve the same access as 9–5 commuters.

Visible safety officers or conductors to deter antisocial behaviour and make the system feel secure for all ages and backgrounds.

Integrated ticketing, one pass for buses, trams, and trains would simplify journeys and encourage use.

Ultimately, people will switch from cars when public transport earns their trust and is affordable.",3,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,5,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,"Yes, but the focus should be on investment and incentives, not restrictions and penalties.

Cheaper and more frequent public transport should be the foundation. If people can rely on it to get to work, school, or appointments without stress or cost barriers, they'll naturally shift away from cars.

Reopen and invest in local train stations like Kings Heath, Moseley, and Stirchley to reconnect neighbourhoods and take pressure off roads.

Build proper cycling infrastructure that’s actually safe and separate from traffic, not just paint on the road. Make it usable year-round for families, commuters, and delivery riders alike.

Reduce traffic near schools, but do it smartly combine this with school bus options and safe walking routes, not just blanket bans or fines for parents.

Introduce more greenery and trees along busy roads to help capture pollutants and improve air quality without turning everything into a sterile concrete zone.

People want cleaner air and better travel options but they need to feel enabled, not punished. That’s the key to long-term change."
68,45-54,Male,Kings Heath ,"More than £80,000",Prefer not to say,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Oppose ""negative"" measures that are anti-car but support ""positive"" measures such as segregated cycle lanes.",1,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I live too far away from where I need to get to;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;Lack of secure cycle storage;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Safe and segregated cycle lanes,3,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Unreliable;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Takes too much time;,"Provide more, make it cheaper, do more to stop anti social behaviour ",5,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Increase EV charger availablity 
69,45-54,Female,Stirchley,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Ltn has made kings heath a living nightmare,3,No,,The cost of a suitable bicycle;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Nothing,2,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Costs too much;Unreliable;,Better service,1,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cosy,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,
70,35-44,Male,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,,1,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Proper cycling Infrastructure,3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;2 trains per hour on most lines / routes is useless.;,"Frequency is a big issues with the new stations opening. 

Bottle necks on bus routes are a real issue, but TfWM seems to want to focus on areas which don't actually have the problem.  ",5,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,"No off street parking and BCC still have not put in legislation for pavement charging, despite it now being advocated by central government.  ",Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,3,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,
71,55-64,Male,Kings heath ,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,,2,Yes,A few times a week,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Restricting vehicle speeds. Educating drivers around the be need to give cyclists space and not to be seen as the enemy. ,5,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"Integrated connectivity between different modes of public transport. Cross travel ticketing to make it easier to hop on hop off. 

Tackling antisocial behaviours",2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Improved cycling infrastructure and restriction of large vehicles during peak times around the start and end of the school day. 
72,65-74,Male,Kings Heath ,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,Yes,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"More notice needs to be taken of wheelchair users needs. Lack of dropped kerbs , doors too narrow , lack of manoeuvrable space in shops / restaurants . Wheelchair taxis that can't take a wheelchair, busses and trains that have no one available to fit and remove ramps.",1,No,,Health or mobility issues;,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Being able to walk,4,Very unlikely,No,Never,Accessibility concerns;,No,5,No,,,,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,5,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Better realistic planning 
73,65-74,Female,Moseley,Prefer not to say,No,Yes,difficulty walking long distance,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Boulders blocking side streets so creating more traffic to other side roads,1,No,,cant cycle;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,too old and toolate to learn,3,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Unreliable;,should be regular but road works every where so buses dont get in time,4,Yes,Hybrid ,Maybe,cost charging,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,3,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,"Remove boulders from side streets, "
74,55-64,Female,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"I oppose the LTN especially the extension to the East of Kings Heath High Street as that will make the few short journeys I do in my car three times as long, slower and mean I will be sitting in traffic. I can’t cycle as I have kit to carry to my tennis club or shopping (the main uses of my car). And with the increased traffic on the arterial routes (one of which I live on), I’m too nervous to cycle. ",2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore","Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;Awful driving and busy arterial routes such as Queensbridge Road ;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Open all the local roads to through traffic to spread the traffic load so the main roads are quieter. Remove the LTN. ,3,Very likely,No,"Yes, regularly",,Bus travel should be much cheaper. ,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,I don’t have anywhere to charge an ev. We have a hybrid as one of our cars already,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Not at all responsible,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Reduce standing traffic. The implementation of LTNs forcing traffic to main roads has increased air pollution. This is noticeable on KH high street and Salisbury Road Moseley which is only going to get worse creating health inequalities for people living and visiting these areas. 
75,35-44,Male,Stirchley,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Closure of the A38M through the city centre. 

Midlands metro rollout expedited. ",1,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Segregated bike lanes. ,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,No,5,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,5,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,
76,55-64,Male,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Support the LTN,2,Yes,Almost every day,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Safer roads. Dedicated , separate cycle lanes where cars cannot drive on. ",4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Improved safety particularly for women,3,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,"Driving range, infrastructure,
Would consider a hybrid vehicle",Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"Better cycling infrastructure 
Safe places to lock bicycles 
Reduction in cycling crime
"
77,55-64,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,1,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Fear of bike being stolen if I leave it somewhere.;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Protected bike lanes. More action against reckless car driving - I feel vulnerable even in my car and feel too scared to cycle on the roads. Many drivers are using drugs, speeding, looking at mobile phones etc.",3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,"Walk whenever possible, but also routes not practical. Eg. KH to Solihull difficult.;",Improve safety but also routes across city boundaries. Eg. KH to Solihull,4,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"All the above. Any transport that is quicker than driving seems to have an impact - trains, trams, metro systems. Free bus passes for school children and over 60s would be helpful."
78,35-44,Male,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,1,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)",I never cycle,"Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Dedicated cycling infrastructure, expanded area for scooter hire, reintroduction of ability to leave hire scooters anywhere rather than designated parking bays",3,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Costs too much;Takes too longs to complete journey because of traffic and parked vehicles blocking bus lanes ;,Extension of bus lanes and enforcement of the restrictions. There are certain areas were authorities are scared to impose the rules and keep the bus lanes clear. Pricing also needs looking at. I live at the south end of kings heath and would love to get the bus to the top end of the high street. But this would cost the same as going all the way to the city centre. So I drive instead.,3,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,Driving range and availability of vehicles to suit my family requirements (3 kids under the age of 4),Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Only support if reduction is over 50%,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,More LTN’s. Making the hire of e-scooters more accessible again
79,45-54,Female,Kings Heath ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,,2,Yes,A few times a week,Poor Weather;Working at home ;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"A reduction in poor driving and car behaviour. The car driving in Birmingham is scary with people seemingly oblivious to speed limits and little regard for cyclists on the road (passing too close, cutting out in front, obstruction of cycle lanes, not giving way etc.). People will.not be encouraged to cycle if this behaviour is left to continue as it is scary on the roads.",5,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,It is expensive to travel on the buses/trams/trains. It would be great if we could have a system like they do in London where you tap on/off on all modes and there is a daily price cap. To travel on public transport to my workplace at the LoB it takes quite a while as the bus ends at Moor St and it is then either an expensive tram hop or a 15 minute brisk walk. A max price cap would make this more accessible. ,4,Yes,Electric,,,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Better policing of poor driver behaviour and enforcement of the LTN and speed limits.
80,45-54,Male,Stirchley ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,A few times a week,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Road space reallocation ,3,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Return the frequency of the cross city line to every 10mins like pre-covid,2,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,"Initial cost, cost of getting a charger, amount of driving I do is so little anyway ",Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,3,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,
81,25-34,Female,Stirchley,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Oppose getting rid of on street parking, as people should be able to park near their home. Other than that, I would welcome more traffic/pollution management measures. ",2,Yes,A few times a year,"Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;Need to fix my bike up, haven’t had time/money to do so ;",Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,More bike lanes – there are lots near by but not immediately in the area ,3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,None;,None,4,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Better connected cycle lanes 
82,45-54,Male,Stirchley,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Cycling provision ,4,Yes,Almost every day,,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Safer traffic ,4,Somewhat unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,No thoughts,4,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,4,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Better charging infrastructure for electric vehicles.
83,55-64,Male,Stirchley,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,Yes,Almost every day,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"better infrastructure, reduced car speed",4,Somewhat unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"buses need to be more reliabile, usually caused by excessive traffic, temporary lights when not needed etc. Less congestion in New Street affecting train reliability",3,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Not at all responsible,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,
84,35-44,Female,Stirchley,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Combination of these - cycling infrastructure only works if you increase all sustainable travel to be inclusive to all. LTN only work if alternative means of travel are invested in to give an alternative to car travel. ,2,Yes,Almost every day,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Expand the Bristol Road cycle path. Educate car users on dangers of driving close to bikes. More infrastructure to get to green cycle ways (eg Cartland Road is dangerous but links to the river Rea). ,2,Very unlikely,No,"Yes, regularly",,"Bus lanes to make sure they run on time, don’t get stuck in traffic. Otherwise it’s pretty good. ",3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"Schools (especially primary) doing more to stop driving. Incentives to take public transport. Cheaper public transport. Better cycling infrastructure. 

Honestly I could keep going. "
85,55-64,Male,Kings Heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Introducing measures that the majority of community support rather than a 'we know what's best for you' attitude adopted by the council. ,3,Yes,A few times a month,Concern about safety;Poor Weather;I live too far away from where I need to get to;,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,secure and covered cycle parking. ,2,Very unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Unreliable;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Not practical for my travel;,"bus routes to where I want to go, food shopping, not readily available plus single journeys expensive (£3) compared to elsewhere (£2 Manchester) or would be free if I was in London, Wales or Merseyside where over 60s travel free. ",3,Yes,Petrol,No,"Charging issues especially when out and about, more likely to catch fire, use rare earth minerals to make eg. lithium for batteries where there are inhumane working conditions and slavery issues, market dominated by China.   ",Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,carrots rather than sticks to incentivise. eg. reduced bus fares and levelling us with London on provision and who can travel free. 
86,25-34,Male,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,1,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Sort out crazy drivers,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,No,4,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,
87,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,I support car free zones but those with mobility difficulties need consideration in terms of access.,1,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"KH is a dangerous area to cycle. Like many areas in Bham, there is an entrenched car culture where many drivers are angry about cyclists and cyclist rights in the Highway Code.",4,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,I use buses all the time.,3,Yes,Petrol,No,Cost and electric vehicle infrastructure is ridiculous. I will probably give up car driving in the next few years.,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"School streets, cycling infrastructure, car free areas. Keep cars on main roads."
88,45-54,Female,Stirchley ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,3,Yes,I never cycle,I live too far away from where I need to get to;Concern about safety;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Fewer dangerous car drivers ,4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;,Anti social behaviour reduction on buses,3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,4,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
89,45-54,Male,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,4,Yes,A few times a month,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather;",Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Nothing,3,Very likely,No,"Yes, regularly",,Rail and buses should be publicly owned and free for all with the same being paid for out of a wealth tax on people with assets in excess of £5 million.,4,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,Awaiting universal charging points that fit all cars and for battery life to vastly improve.,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Publicly owned and funded bus and rail
91,55-64,Male,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,A few times a month,"Poor Weather;I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Cycle lanes,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;,"More of it e.g. metro, trams, plus integrated ticketing.",4,Yes,Diesel,No,"Cost, lack of charging infrastructure, time to recharge",Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,5,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,"A proper, integrated public transport system.  I cannot think of any other major european city that does relies almost entirley on buses for public transport."
92,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",Yes,Yes,"Difficulty walking long distances, and cycling.
Also standing still queuing as it has impact on hips and knees where my disability is based.",Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,"LTN in general I disapprove. It pushes volume of traffic and pollution into other areas.
I avoid Kings Heath High Street as access through on both buses and cars is very poor at most times.
People become frustrated and so driving standards drop considerably. Local Ciuncil lies about access for emergency vehicles, ambulances are not encouraged to complain, and it takes time and effort to this, which they don't have! If it doesn't fit BCC agenda, it isn't reported to the public.
It has encouraged an 'us and them' mentality in Kings Heath. If you have access to easy public transport or can cycle, they are basically ignoring the problems for others who have to drive for mobility of jobs ie caring sector and disability,  particularly carrying shopping, having small children etc.
In practice, LTN's do not lower overall air pollution, the data supports this if monitor over a wider area, but it is not beneficial for local councils to publish the data! Green washing!
Availability to public transport which is accessible to all and is cheap, is the best way to encourage people to use it. 
Wheelchair users have abysmal treatment on public transport, and now they are being shamed for having a car!
Mandatory enforcement is not the way forward
It is trendy for those in KH and Moseley to support the LTN....",1,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;I live too far away from where I need to get to;It’s too hilly in my area;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Definitely not! Most people use canal infrastructures due to safety on public roads.
Road traffic deaths for cyclists has increased considerably.
Unfortunately young men are too hotheaded, too ignorant and entitled to care about other road users. Under 25's should be compelled to take road safety driving courses with reporting to insurance companies that they have been undertaken as part of their policy!",2,Very unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Accessibility concerns;,If I don't use my car I have a long walk to nearest train station! Buses are too infrequent and roadworks / traffic conditions means buses are unreliable; journey times very  disproportionate to actual mileage covered.,4,Yes,Petrol,No,Infrastructure not compatible and probably never will be!,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,"Tree planting and care of trees would help reduce pollution.Birmingham has lost a vast amount of their trees to make way for road, railway and posh large housing estates. Decidedly lack of putting these back. The amount if trees destroyed in Kings Heath, Moseley and Stirchley, as well as for HS2 is not reported. 
They are being replaced with small insubstantial trees and looked after well. I have had long discussions with council arborealists (tree specialists).
Cycling not sustainable due ro road designs, cycle paths disappear- eg Cartland Road!"
93,25-34,Female,Kings heath,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,"I particularly support car free zones outside schools and charges for entering certain places at peak times, as I think this would encourage people to use public transport / active travel",2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;Concern about safety;Risk of getting my bike stolen;,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Not sure ,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"When I speak to people who don't use public transport, they often mention safety concerns - e.g., they'd feel intimidated using public transport because anti social behaviour isn't always dealt with properly. Also, buses often feel dirty with litter on the floor, dirt on the seats, etc.",1,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,3,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
94,55-64,Female,Kings Heath ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,LTN is a disaster in KH traffic is rerouted to congested roads whilst side roads are now just car parks ,4,No,,Concern about safety;I live too far away from where I need to get to;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Nothing as it’s too far for me to cycle where I need to go or with shopping I need a boot for food items ,4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Unreliable;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Open the stations and ensure trains and stations are safe ,4,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Re open LTns and ban parking on one side of all current closed roads to ease traffic congestion 
95,25-34,Male,Stirchley,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,,3,No,,Concern about safety;,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Nothing,4,Somewhat likely,Yes,Occasionally,Unreliable;,No,5,Yes,Petrol,No,Cost,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,No
96,75 and older,Female,Stirchley,"Up to £14,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,I don’t like the LTN in kings Heath- it just sends the traffic onto other roads/ pointless! ,3,No,,I’m 83 and can’t cycle any more ;,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral, Nothing ,4,Neither likely nor unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;,Yes - the bus drivers drive off before I have got to a seat and the bus jerks and I am frightened of falling over. ,3,No,,,,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Parents should be encouraged to walk their children to school and children should have to go to the nearest primary school to their home 
97,18-24,Female,Stirchley,Prefer not to say,No,Yes,Motion sickness makes it hard for me to stay on buses and in cars for an extended period.,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,,4,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)","I used to cycle, but not anymore",Don't have the room to keep a bike in my flat;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Let Cyclists back onto the pavement, I believe that forcing Bicycles onto the roads has made them more dangerous to pedestrians because Cyclists remove features such as bells as they are unable to alert a driver with them, meanwhile Cyclists have adopted electric bicycles to keep up with cars so they don't get run over.",4,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"Reducing the cost of tickets would be a big help, and easier access to information about transport changes (like changing bus routes) as there are many people who aren't able to navigate transport websites.",3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
99,35-44,Female,Stirchley ,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Cycling infrastructure ,2,Yes,A few times a month,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Safe routes for cycling which connect up. I want to cycle with my children but there's often bits of a route that aren't safe so we can't cycle,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Better ticketing which covers all forms if transport for same price - currently too expensive to switch transport type,2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,"Connecting up safe routes to cycle, much greater promotion of cycling and walking to school, school streets"
100,65-74,Male,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,For those of us living on boundary roads LTNs have been a disaster,3,Yes,A few times a month,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,"For me, it’s just a matter of cycling more frequently. ",4,Very likely,Yes,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel;,Reduced fares for workers,3,Yes,Hybrid ,No,Lack of infrastructure,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,"Cheaper public transport, opening up the LTN roads to provide a more equitable distribution of traffic"
101,18-24,Male,Stirchley,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,,4,Yes,I never cycle,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Health or mobility issues;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather;Social stigma;It’s too hilly in my area;",Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,.,2,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Costs too much;Unreliable;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;,Night service ,5,Yes,Petrol,No,Driving range infrastructure just isn’t there. Where I live there isn’t any eclectic infrastructure ,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,4,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,
102,45-54,Male,Moseley,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,I would strongly support expansion of the CAZ to the outer ring road in Birmingham. I think this would have a more significant impact on air quality than just the city core and take in a lot of residential areas that currently struggle to meet air quality standards.,1,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Lack of safe/secure cycle parking at destinations ;,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Good, segregated cycling infrastructure that is well connected via spurs into residential areas. Measures to calm motor vehicle traffic. Enforcement of close passing. Community events. School engagement. ",3,Neither likely nor unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"Reliability, cleanliness, enforcement of headphone use and drugs use on buses. Women’s safety.",4,Yes,Electric,,,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,4,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Vehicle weight limits - get HGVs off residential roads other than those at higher classification - A roads.
103,55-64,Male,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,I’d like traffic to flow,2,No,,I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,None,3,Somewhat likely,No,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,Linked up transport systems ,5,No,,,,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,1,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Infrastructure 
104,35-44,Male,Stirchley,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Better cycling infrastructure and better public transport would help reduce reliance on cars, so presumably those should be prioritised!",3,Yes,A few times a week,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Better maintenance of the towpath (especially with cutting back overgrowth), more space for bike lanes along (for example) Pershore Road. ",4,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Better affordability will help greatly. Current costs for public transportation are quite high which impacts upon decision-making.,3,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
105,25-34,Female,Stirchley ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,4,Yes,A few times a year,"Poor Weather;It’s too hilly in my area;I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety",Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Perhaps more specific events like bike month where for a few hours there would be a mass cycle to provide safety in numbers.

Ability of changing facilities at work or financial incentives.

Public access to things like pumps or puncture repair kits ",4,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"For the new line I think the regularity of services would need to be increased as what is currently planned wouldn’t be enough for commuters. 

We need a tap on tap off or capped system to integrate bus, train, bike and tram as currently I waste money by buying return tickets but then needing to use another form of transport to travel home. ",2,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,Driving range as I regularly drive to rural areas and also hundreds of miles up and down the country to visit friends or family ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,3,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,"Cheaper public transport.
Better apps for checking when buses are due 
Improved safety on buses, especially at night 
Opportunities to spread the cost of travel 
Incentivised green travel days through work "
106,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,,2,Yes,A few times a week,"Poor Weather;I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,If car drivers were less aggressive and dangerous around cyclists I would cycle more,4,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,It needs to be cheaper and the bus lanes should be protected all the time so buses run faster than private vehicles foe the same journey,2,Yes,Diesel,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"Better cycling infrastructure, protected bus lanes and policing of bad driving and parking on pavements"
107,65-74,Male,Moseley,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,"The 3 Bs - bollards (LTNs), Bike/Bus lanes on main roads,, Busting bad drivers. Why? Cos it works across NL/DK/D cities - massively safer env for active travel, mode share the complete flip of dumb ass West Mids.",1,Yes,A few times a week,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,"West Midland Police doing their job properly instead of wholly prioritising drivers’ safety and property, but sweet FA for VRUs",3,Neither likely nor unlikely,No,Occasionally,No need other than occasional ,"Please stop obsessing about PT, the WM actually already has a higher modal share for PT than say Hague/Rotterdam conurbation. It’s unrealistic to think we can massively increase PT use while leaving the private car unconstrained and massively subsidised (ie all externality costs unallocated)",3,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,Cost and unsuitability for my journeys,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Law enforcement on neighbourhood roads rather than endless excuses and dodging of responsibilities by WMP
108,65-74,Female,Stirchley ,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,Yes,Old age,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,"I would support more bus stops in strategic locations eg at the bottom of Fordhouse hill.  Also some common sense in placement of double yellows, see vicarage rd shops.  Council have turned road into a race track, double yellows on the wrong side of street!",3,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;It’s too hilly in my area,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Nothing ,3,Very likely,No,"Yes, regularly",,"On time bus, more stops see earlier answer",2,Yes,Diesel,No,Would give up driving if bus service improved ,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,3,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,"Cleaner trains, new stations using diesel engines."
109,45-54,Female,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,A few times a year,Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,If there wasn’t so much dangerous driving and speeding by car drivers ,4,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"The price, the bus faces have recently gone up twice, the 2nd to last increase was a massive increase",4,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,4,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Not sure,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Reduced traffic near schools. More tickets given out for anti social parking near schools eg on double yellow lines 
110,45-54,Male,Kings Heath,Prefer not to say,No,Yes,Need to call taxis sometimes,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,,1,No,,Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;Crime too high to safely park a bike,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Emphasising cycling carries the risk of discriminating against physically disabled people who need a car to leave their home. For example LTNs mean it takes longer and costs more to get taxis etc..,4,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"Lack of police in areas around bus stops especially in the evening makes it unsafe to wait for buses after dark, this is more of an issue than it was years ago as violent crime has increased",2,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not at all responsible,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Disability is always completely overlooked in these schemes. Even if buses are accessible paths are nearly always blocked where I live making wheelchair access impossible. Everyone gets disabled in the end if they live past 80 years of age so it's in everyone's best interests not to focus merely on cycling and walking as a means to reduce pollution. A lot of people just can't walk far.
111,65-74,Female,Stirchley ,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,,3,No,,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,I have no wish to cycle ,4,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Unreliable,Fares better priced ,3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
112,35-44,Female,Stirchley ,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,Yes,"Neurodiverse family, can’t do busy, crowded places & unreliable transport links cause extra stress",Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,The reopening of the Stirchley-Moseley train line,3,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)","I used to cycle, but not anymore","I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Health or mobility issues;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes)",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,A full safe route into the city centre ,3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Not practical for my travel,Frequency & safety ,3,Yes,Diesel,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,4,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Free travel for school aged kids like in London. 
113,55-64,Female,Moseley,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,Yes,Walking & cycling - during flares both of these are difficult but other times I can walk some distance ,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Oppose LTN.  How is being forced to drive further for longer helping anyone?  Even if half the street switch modes, the others are still travelling much further and cancel that out. My route home is not a rat run, it is the most direct least polluting quickest route to my house.  Now I have to go into Moseley village to cross Kings Heath High St to get to the other side when it’s st the end of my road!  I always walk to either KH or Moseley, but it’s the onward journeys that are most impacted, with most of the time wasted trying to get across the congested high st, the only place the traffic can now go.  If I catch the bus, it is stuck in that too.  Sheer stupidity of an idea. 
I would strongly support night bus and train services.  I have tonight been left stranded in Stratford because the last two trains were cancelled, and the only one left would get us home via Warwick at 2am.   In future I’ll drive. We caught an uber at an additional cost of 45.  Public transport is not reliable. ",4,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore","I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Health or mobility issues;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time",Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,"New knees, when I did cycle I would often do so on the pavement on pedestrian free roads ",3,Somewhat unlikely,No,"Yes, regularly",,"Frequency, night buses, safety officers would be fab, no
Smoking, no loud phones on tik tok",4,Yes,Electric,,,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,"Remove the LTN - then people would not be on the road for as long, the distance they have to travel would be reduced and pollution would be reduced. 
Kings Heath is in the Green zone for pollution statistics. 
The LTN forces more traffic past schools, yet you’re trying to compare it with smoking? Of course I don’t want children breathing cigarette smoke or pollution, but look at Ella Kissi Debrah - she walked a main road to school, like the High St, where all the traffic will now be forced, unable to leave it, driving past their road to go an extra 1.4km because the High St exit is blocked. The LTN is moronic. "
114,45-54,Female,Stirchley,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,,3,Yes,A few times a week,"Poor Weather;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Concern about safety;I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes)",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Protected and safe bike lanes with maintained surfaces,2,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Cost and frequency,2,No,,,,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,2,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,
115,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,,3,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)","I used to cycle, but not anymore",Concern about safety;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,I don’t need to - I can walk everywhere ,4,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Not practical for work but no need to at home as all amenities close by ,Cheaper and faster ways to get to Stratford upon Avon 😅,3,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,No money ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,
116,35-44,Male,Kings heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"School buses it creates so much traffic, the 6 week holiday proves that",2,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,You just can't lock your bike anywhere these days ,3,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Costs too much;It just takes to long with all the stops,No,2,Yes,Diesel,No,I live in a first floor apartment unless you've got a drive way what's the point,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,3,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not at all responsible,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Cheaper transport
117,65-74,Male,Kings heath,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,no,2,Yes,A few times a week,,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,none,4,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,lower fares ,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,cost,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,3,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
118,55-64,Female,Stirchley,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes),Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,My main cycle route is the canal towpath which is v narrow in places,3,Somewhat unlikely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Better Sunday service - trains don’t start until 9:30 from bournville,5,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
119,45-54,Female,Stirchley,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Low traffic neighbourhoods just result in the problem being moved elsewhere and I do not believe only some people deserve clean air. I also believe it creates more air pollution in the long run as more traffic is forced onto a smaller number of roads, causing congestion, meaning people are in traffic jams, causing more air pollution.
I am strongly opposed to roads around school being closed also as it makes other roads more dangerous. I live by a school that has just closed the road. Parents park dangerously on a main road now, including on double yellow lines, making it impossible to see when you pull out of my road.",3,No,,None of these,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,I wouldn’t cycle as I don’t enjoy it.,4,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,The frequency and cleanliness of the bus. Safety officers would also support people to access public transport.,1,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,"On my road, you cannot guarantee a parking spot outside of your house so would make the car difficult to charge. ",Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,"Increase in reliability of public transport. I have only recently learned to drive and do not enjoy it. However, when trying to get to work on time, it is impossible to rely on buses-they don’t turn up, they are then too packed to get on. Due to the nature of my work, I felt forced to learn to drive as public transport was too unreliable."
120,65-74,Male,Moseley,"Up to £14,999",No,No,,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,More car free zones required,2,No,,Concern about safety;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes),Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Safer, car free roads",5,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,None,1,No,,,,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,5,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,More car free roads
121,55-64,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,1,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes),Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,More cycle lanes,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Cleaner bus interiors,3,Yes,Petrol,No,Do not consider them as eco friendly as portrayed,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Cheaper public transport
122,35-44,Male,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,I never cycle,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Na,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,NA,2,Yes,Diesel,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,
123,45-54,Female,Moseley,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Reliable Public transport ,1,Yes,Almost every day,,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Safer streets,3,Very likely,Yes,Never,Too Crowded;Unreliable;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Not practical for my travel,Cleaner,2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,5,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,"Attitudes need to change, people need to be pro cycling and walking and not so lazy"
124,35-44,Male,Kings Heath ,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,LTN is useless and only serves to placate middle class liberals that live in the centre of kings Heath.,4,Yes,A few times a month,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ",Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Lower crime rate,5,Somewhat likely,No,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel,No,4,Yes,Diesel,No,"We live on a row of terraced houses where you can’t regularly park in an allocated space. Range, infrastructure and the fact they are no better for the environment are all a concern.",Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Nope
125,55-64,Male,Kings heath ,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,Yes,Difficulty in  walking ,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,,3,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Health or mobility issues,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Nothing ,4,Neither likely nor unlikely,No,"Yes, regularly",,No,3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,5,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Not sure,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Band all cars 10yrs or older
126,45-54,Male,Moseley,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,LTNs. The way they are introduced on roads that are relatively quite to begin with before proper public infrastructure is in place merely leads to traffic displacement with no studies being done of before and after traffic levels on boundary and main roads so no real data on impact ,3,Yes,A few times a week,I live too far away from where I need to get to,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,"Nothing. My work is 28 miles away I cannot cycle to there. There are plenty of alternative cycle routes that could be set up that utilise the canal toe paths, our parks etc that would create lots of majority car free routes but this is a sticking plaster solution. Reliable, integrated mass public transport system is needed separate from roads",3,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel;Costs too much;Too Crowded;Unreliable;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,Currently too slow and too unsafe. It’s not integrated so getting to places I go most often is not practical by bus. ,4,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,"Better reliable, integrated mass public transport infrastructure. Cities of Birmingham’s size need separate from road underground/overground rail network that allows the most people to use quickly, easily and safely. That is where the focus should be. Motor pollution per vehicle is the lowest it has ever been. Deaths on the road is the lowest (or near lowest a) it has been: the problem lies in lack of motoring law enforcement. Existing rules and laws need to be enforced.  "
127,45-54,Female,Kings Heath ,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes),Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Safe spaces to cyber ,4,Very likely,No,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel,No ,2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,
128,45-54,Male,Stirchley,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,,4,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",None of these,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Easier bike parking at home, can be difficult in a terraced house.",4,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Reliability and cost.,2,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,
129,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,Prefer not to say,Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"LTN has been excellent for my road. Previously we had cars speeding down our road during rush hour, with children being dropped off at the local schools. That has now stopped and the road is much safer.",3,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)","I used to cycle, but not anymore","I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Scared of Islamophobic, racist and sexist comments from drivers ",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Safer roads - lower speed limit,4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Unreliable,Cheaper,2,Yes,Hybrid ,No,I travel long distance regularly and charging vehicle may not be practical,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Cheaper public transport for families/groups. 
130,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,Prefer not to say,Yes,Yes,Difficulty walking long distances ,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"LTN’s, they have just pushed the traffic and pollution to other areas and roads. This causing back logs on Vicarage Rd and Alcester Rd, defeating the objective. ",1,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"A safe bike lane or section but sectioned off, make bikes more affordable and available. Encourage schools to offer bike riding proficiency lessons, may encourage them not to come by car. Give incentives to ride a bike . ",3,Somewhat unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"Improve the frequency, for them to stop disappearing from the screens, to arrive on time, not to come 3 at a time and then no bus for 50 minutes. Reduction in cannabis smokers on the bus, a reduction in free loaders- the bus drivers just letting people get in for free all the time. Bus drivers need more customer service training some are very rude. They get paid far too much. ",1,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,"Cheaper public transport 
Remove LTN’s they have just pushed the pollution elsewhere not solved the problem 
Reduce traffic around schools
Encourage schools to offer transport to cut down on the students all coming by cat"
131,35-44,Male,Moseley,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,,3,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Proper enforcement of laws against speeding and dangerous driving ,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Improved frequency - even switching from to 3tph from 2tph on the Camp Hill Line will make a big difference in my opinion (but even more frequent would be better!) ,3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,2,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
132,65-74,Female,Kings Heath ,Prefer not to say,No,Yes,Difficulties walking and deaf,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,,5,No,,Health or mobility issues;Poor Weather;The cost of a suitable bicycle;It’s too hilly in my area,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,"What a joke. Most disabled people cannot walk let alone cycle.  We do not live in a flat country like Amsterdam. People can no longer get to Kings Heath. Many Roads outside King's Heath ward now have all the traffic. BCC are dictators and are not listening to the majority. I very rarely see cycle lanes being used.  Why are our council wasting tax payers money , I know it comes from Central Government but our council is incompetent and the people who plan closures and cycle lanes do not live in the areas .",4,Very unlikely,No,Never,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Accessibility concerns,Stop people smelling of weed,4,Yes,Diesel,No,The government pushed diesel vehicles and now say they pollute. Electric cars will go the same way.  We are threatened with power cuts in winter and electricity is expensive.  What happens when the power runs out.,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,The plans for the second phase of LTN will cause more pollution yo schools in my area. But BCC and TWM only care about the schools in King's Heath Ward and not the Roads where the cheaper houses are. 
133,45-54,Male,Stirchley,"Up to £14,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"school buses are a great way to prevent kids clogging up the normal bus network, as you often can't get on a bus when the schools are letting out
public transport not running 24 hours locks out people from using the services and makes car ownership essential for many on shift work or similar",2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore","Concern about safety;risk of theft, there just isn't any real secure parking for bycycles, and the police take little or no interest in thefts. Businesses should be encouraged to provide secure (internal) parking for bycycles for staff use",Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,"more secure bike parking, more police enforcement on dangerous driving",3,Neither likely nor unlikely,No,"Yes, regularly",,"reduced cost, buses are getting so expensive i'm beginning to hesitate to use them
increased reliability
more frequent services at night etc as shift workers get poor service from public transport",3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,2,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Not very responsible ,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,"cheaper buses, more frequent buses during the night, more police enforcement of driving regulation, courts dramatically cutting the number of people still allowed to drive with 12 or more points on their licence (all too often 'i need a car to get to work' is accepted . Reduce parents choice over schools and go back to children going to a local school within walking distance"
134,55-64,Female,Stirchley,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,Yes,Avoiding crowded and noisy transport ,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"LTNs so far have created inequality within areas as they haven't reduced transport by car, just redirected car travel to other roads",3,Yes,A few times a month,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes),Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"My main concern is the dangerous car use by young men with no consequence. I can't believe there aren't more deaths to be honest, its a massive problem and risk for everyone, but especially those with higher mobility needs and children. It makes cycling a risk.",4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Too Crowded,I don't like buses but I do use trains. Pineapple station will increase my train use as its closer to my house. My daughter struggles when its crowded. New Street station staff can be really hostile to young people with invisible disabilities. ,2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,"All of the above. Better control of anti-social driving. Male entitlement and culture in Birmingham that I have rarely seen elsewhere, its a huge problem, apparently ignored by everyone. There is no way when car use is so dominant in such an aggressive way that people will cycle or walk more as it's simply unsafe. Our public space in Birmingham is extremely dominated by aggressive and entitled male culture - one has to wonder why that is and how it is allowed to continue. "
135,45-54,Female,Moseley,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,LTNs move traffic to other areas causing congestion and increased pollution in those areas,3,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",I live too far away from where I need to get to,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Roads to feel safer,4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel,Safety officer ,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cost infrastructure ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,4,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,
136,45-54,Female,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Even though it can be inconvenient I can appreciate the bigger scale importance of schemes to reduce car usage and control climate impact. ,3,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Health or mobility issues,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Joined up lanes. Drivers less anti-bike,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,I have a car,Cost reduction,4,Yes,Electric,,,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,
137,75 and older,Female,Moseley,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,Yes,Husband has dementia and mobility issues and I am his sole carer so I am with him 24/7 using bus and walkibg,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"Kings Heath LTN is going too far and is a nightmare for those of us who must drive 
One way traffic is a much better option along with traffic calming ",4,No,,Health or mobility issues,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,If I was 50 years younger,4,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Extend the number of roads where buses are available eg Russell Road,3,Yes,Petrol,No,I live in an apartment so no facility for charging,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,4,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Reduction in speeding bad parking and big penalties for those that don’t comply
138,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Need more buses,1,No,,I cant cycle! Its scary and I fall off!,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Dont know,2,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"More buses, less anti social behaviour on them",1,No,,,,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,3,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not very responsible ,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,
139,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,,3,No,,Need equipment for work,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Safer routes,4,Neither likely nor unlikely,Yes,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,It feels unsafe,5,Yes,Electric,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not sure,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,The LTN are just causing bottlenecks and pollution for people outside the area. It would be good to look at how lining streets with trees could buffer pollution for pedestrians. I think the train station reopening will really encourage public transport usage but there needs to be a park and ride further out to support commuters.
140,35-44,Male,Stirchley,"£35,000 to £59,999",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,,3,Yes,A few times a year,"Health or mobility issues;I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes)",Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Already been said,4,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Reliability of 35,4,Yes,Hybrid ,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
141,55-64,Male,Moseley,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,,5,Yes,I never cycle,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;It’s too hilly in my area;I live too far away from where I need to get to,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Nothing,4,Somewhat likely,No,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel,No,4,Yes,Petrol,No,"Cost, depreciation, range",Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,1,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not at all responsible,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,"Get rid of all LTNs. What do you mean by """"sustaianble"" ?"
142,55-64,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,2,No,,Concern about safety;I live too far away from where I need to get to,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Nothing. I don’t feel safe cycling particularly with the fact that there is so much speeding and nothing is done about it. I also live too far from the places I need to travel. If somewhere is near enough I’ll walk but cycling is forever a No! ,3,Neither likely nor unlikely,Yes,Never,Not practical for my travel;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,Never using a bus. May use the train as if needed can move carriages and hopefully will be clean and quick. ,2,Yes,Petrol,No,"Cost, driving range, lack of charging infrastructure ",Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,4,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Buses for children going to school so they are not all driven individually to school in a car. 
143,35-44,Male,Moseley,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,LTN has ruined Moseley and KH. Harmed road network and disconnected people from suburbs. Existing roads cannot handle traffic and increased volumes of stationary traffic. Public transport totally inadequate to help.,3,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore","Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"Less bad driving. As a confident cyclists j will.not rode a bike in Brum. Car, bus and taxi drivers are all totally unsafe",3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel;Costs too much;Unreliable;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,Trains need to be reliable and affordable. Buses are horrific. Slow and unsociable. Too expensive to be an unpleasant alternative to driving. Return buses from town are utterly awful and moors at interchange is grim,4,Yes,Diesel,Maybe,Wife has one. Current range does not suit 2 x EV in our household with work and lifestyle needs,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,"The biggest issues are not car numbers but speed and bad driving. EVs are not a silver bullet, (illegal)e bikes are incredibly dangerous and bad driving and riding is the biggest issue. Food delivery companies should be responsible to the legality and competence of their contractors. LTNs do not serve to improve air quality. They improve a handful of roads to the detriment of everyone else and are a highly selfish solution that are not for the greater good and in relaity cause more pollution  than they solve. Journeys from my home to KH are more than double the mileage and require a car for major shopping so I tend to avoid KH altogether now. Public transport is poor. Not value, not reliable and whilst the rail service is promising my expectations based on thee delivery of the scheme are very low. Zero confidence in public servants elected and otherwise to arrange anything in the city. Contributing to my line term plan to relocated after 20 plus years here."
144,18-24,Male,Moseley,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,"Creating improved cycling infrastructure. Having witnessed and lived cycling culture in other countries, particularly The Netherlands, I can say firsthand that it would simultaneously reduce congestion, improve the collective health of people in the area, and offer a lower cost method of commuting for local residents.",1,Yes,Almost every day,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,"I think cycling safety is the primary concern. The lack of infrastructure and the volume of congestion makes cycling particularly hazardous, which disincentivises it as a method of transport. 

Combining systems that promote cycling safety, while also providing financial incentives such as bike subsidies would be significant in promoting cycling uptake in the area.",3,Very likely,Yes,Periodically,Costs too much;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,"Bus travel is the most local form of public transportation that I can access. However, it is just as, if not more expensive than train travel, and frankly is far less pleasant. Reducing or offering better value transport for regular commuters could incentivise greater uptake.

That being said, train travel, once the stations are completed, is likely to take on a significant load of commuters, which could reduce congestion on buses, and contribute to a collectively improved experience. ",3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,3,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Better cycling infrastructure and cheaper public transport. 
145,35-44,Male,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);It’s too hilly in my area,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Dedicated bike lanes,4,Somewhat likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Costs too much,Cheaper,3,Yes,Hybrid ,No,Driving range,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,4,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,
146,25-34,Female,Stirchley ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Connecting up cycling infrastructure e.g. between NCN and 'Blue Route' to make it more useable,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Frequency and priority routes for buses,4,No,,,,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,All of the above
147,55-64,Female,Kings Heath ,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,LTN's that reduce air quality and increase traffic to main thoroughfares and more residents ,2,Yes,A few times a month,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Poor Weather,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Safer and wider bike lanes. Cartland road bike lane way to narrow and bollards in the middle force cars too close,5,Very likely,No,"Yes, regularly",,No I use public transport often,3,Yes,Petrol,No,Cost driving range and instability and fire risk of the batteries,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,"Scrap LTN's altogether. Make schools responsible for ensuring there are safe areas for parents to drop the children, actually on school premises, so as to avoid chaos on the roads."
148,75 and older,Female,Kings Heath ,Prefer not to say,No,Yes,"Difficulty walking, ",Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,"LTN's, even the people who live in the so called clean air roads don't want them.",1,No,,Health or mobility issues,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Nothing ,2,Very unlikely,No,Never,"No bus runs along my road, and I am unable to walk as far as the nearest bus stop.",Buses to go along all roads.,3,Yes,Hybrid ,No,There is not enough infrastructure to cope with electric vehicles. Also it takes too long to recharge the electric cars when you're away from home. ,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Can't think of anything 
149,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,Yes,Can’t walk far as knee problems ,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,"Since ltn started it is impossible to get out of our road during hrs of 0800-0915,and 1545-1800",3,No,,Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Safer roads ,4,Very unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Never,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe;Accessibility concerns,Can’t use buses through mobility,4,Yes,Hybrid ,Maybe,Asses to charging stations ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,5,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,More consultations with people who actually live in the roads affected instead of just assuming everyone agrees.
150,45-54,Male,Kings Heath,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"I vehemently oppose LTN's, we all pay our road tax to use the roads therfore we should be allowed to use all the roads. This would spread out the car emissions instead of concentrating all the fumes on certain areas where it can impact people's life and health through no fault of their own. ",1,Yes,A few times a week,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"Better, safer, more well lit and wider cycle lanes ",5,Very likely,Yes,Rarely ,Costs too much;Too Crowded,Cheaper and more frequent ,3,Yes,Hybrid ,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,"Cycling infrastructure is extremely poor, and in some cases dangerous, and as for buses, £2,90 is a ridiculous minimum charge!"
151,55-64,Female,Moseley ,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,Yes,"Difficulty walking short distances, difficult to cycle. Makes it hard to use buses too as the stops are too far away. ",Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"I am opposed to closing the high street and other areas to cars or making traffic go miles around to get to their intended destination. I believe it increases traffic in the designated areas as well as causing immense traffic jams.
However, I believe that people should be encouraged where possible to make informed, moral choices of using public transport or cycling as I did before becoming disabled.  To facilitate this our infrastructure needs to change to be more like that of Holland where a bike is simply part of everyday life.",3,Yes,A few times a year,Health or mobility issues,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Safety and co.munity will help people to give it a try,4,Very unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Accessibility concerns;Bus stops too far from my house.  I was not disabled when I moved here,A nearer route,2,No,,,,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,3,Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Very responsible ,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Better and more acceptable and accepted cycling infrastructure 
152,55-64,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,,3,No,,None of these;Work from home ,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,My Lifestyle does not entail cycling ,5,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,I rarely travel, No - I think the bus services are adequate ,1,No,,,,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,4,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,
153,55-64,Female,Moseley,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Much more parking restrictions in residential areas eg permits required, limited per household, to reduce number of cars
And Better policing of illegal car and driver behaviour and parking as these are what make cycling and walking so awful in bham. No amount of blue cycle lanes protect you from the mega idiots (or the rain!)",1,Yes,Once a week,Concern about safety,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,"As for previous free text answer.
In addition: 
The cycle lanes that have been introduced have several flaws particularly at entry and exit points as if they havent been trialled well by people who aren’t familiar with the design. 
It only needs one difficult crossing on a route to stop many people from wanting to use it or let their kids use it for daily commute

Canal path routes are available but access on to them is impossible unless u r an iron man who can carry bikes up steps at most potential joining points, plus lighting is poor and safety a concern. 
 ",3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Unreliable;Not practical for my travel,Train will help but buses need clear bus lanes and modal filters and most local bis lanes are full of cars that are parked illegally,2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,5,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Very responsible ,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,"Better policing and far far far harsher penalties for bad driving or parking (blocking pavements etc) and same for illegal car adaptations as these go hand in hand. 
  I support LTNs as a way of doing this but only if they are across the whole city at the same time. Your last study shows no sampling data of air pollution from roads that were massively affected by kings heath LTN (eg oxford road, wake green and woodbridge ). the latter lies outside the full LTN and is one road parallel to the boundary road. 
Illegal electric bikes are now becoming a nuisance and sometimes danger on local dedicated cycle routes because of the way they are ridden. Otherwise I would support wider use of electric scooters but the people of birmingham are far too selfish to use them safely enough.  
Much Cheaper cycle hire and even scooter hire with helmets should be considered too for those thr dont have their own bike. "
154,25-34,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Would strongly support enforcement to prevent pavement parking which has become a significant safety issue in Kings Heath in particular but wider South Bham too,1,No,,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,It all comes down to safety. There is palpable hostility among car users towards cyclists at worst and ambivalence towards their safety at best,3,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,I already use the 50 and 35 bus frequently but antisocial behaviour has become an issue. Also waiting for the bus home from outside Selfridges - it’s v unpleasant especially at busy times,2,No,,,,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Better cycling and active travel infrastructure
155,45-54,Female,Moseley ,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,Yes,A few times a month,Concern about safety;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes),Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Cars travelling too fast. No trust that they will adhere to the stop signs or any other control so do not feel safe,5,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,"I take the 50 and it is a great service, modern bus and generally good standard of cleanliness. However the cost is ever increasing. This applies to all public transport really. Why can't we get more subsidised travel like London? Something that links bus, train & tram would be ideal",5,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,5,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
156,18-24,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,I would support having more on street electric vehicle charging as it would encourage people like me to get an EV. ,3,No,,I live too far away from where I need to get to;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,I personally think cycling is a thing that if someone wants to do it they would be already. I think there’s a decent amount of cycling provisions like the rental bikes and cycle lanes around the south part of the city so the option exists if you’re unsure but I do think most cyclists are dedicated and would do it regardless of if the infrastructure was improved or not. All in all though I think the current system to cycling is good. ,3,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"Older buses are horrendously dirty, which makes me appreciate the electric buses that are expanding across the city. I think if we had more buses like that people would enjoy getting buses more and treat them with more respect as they make travelling much more pleasant. But the bus network gets very frustrating, particularly in the southern (Northfield, Kings Norton, Selly Oak) area as the buses keep changing routes, which wouldn’t be as bad if they were frequent enough that connecting services were an ease to get to. 
Outside of this the most prevalent issue that I think drives people away from public transport is the cost, as my 4 week bus pass now costs £70 which is absurd considering I was paying £46 around a year ago. If a bus ticket felt like a small minor expense it would be more encouraging to hop on. The same goes for trains. A 15 minute train return shouldn’t cost £6+. ",4,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,2,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,"Public transport should be cheaper. Having the new, modern buses and trains that have been introduced in the city are a good sign as they are more enjoyable to travel in but that might not encourage people to get them if the cost is too much. "
157,35-44,Female,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,,2,No,,"I live too far away from where I need to get to;I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes)",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Yes,3,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Unreliable;Costs too much;Too Crowded,"More frequent buses, clean busses",2,Yes,Hybrid ,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,3,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,
158,35-44,Male,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,No,,None of these,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Unsure,4,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,No,4,Yes,Electric,,,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,3,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Unsure
159,55-64,Female,Kings heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Charging to enter cities is a good idea but should have special dispensation for hospitals or major public transport access. Ie dropping people off at new street,2,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)",A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);The fear of theft ,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,"Better road surfaces, roads are terrible to drive on in a car let alone a bike",5,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,I use as and when it’s convenient ,More safer travel checks would give more confidence ,2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Safety has to be priority. Taxis use roads very badly and often they are older cars which must add to pollution and congestion yet they seem to be overlooked as a problem. 
160,75 and older,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,LTNs throw far too much traffic onto already busy roads-unfortunate if you happen to live on one of the already busy roads.Not bad in the school holidays but modern school children can't walk any distance or catch public transport as they are such wimps !!!!!,3,No,,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,N/A,4,Somewhat unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel,Safety,2,Yes,Hybrid ,No,"Charging,range",Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,5,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,
161,65-74,Male,Kings heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,,3,No,,Concern about safety,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,At 71 years it is not currently on my agenda. I walk everywhere if I can. I go to the gym 3 times a week and can use the exercise cycles there if I wish.,5,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Already use it almost every day,3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,3,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Driving children to school should be actively discouraged 
162,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Clean air zones particularly near schools to help health for young people.,3,No,,"Can't ride a bike, no sense of balance",Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Nothing,4,Neither likely nor unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,The 50 is an excellent service. More frequent Would be good.,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cost to buy and range currently .,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,3,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Encourage families to walk to school and senior school pupils to use buses. Too much traffic near local schools.
163,35-44,Female,Kings heath ,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Neutral,,3,Yes,Almost every day,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,I shound not worry about if they are going to steal my bike. Last ten years three stolen bikes. It was stressful.,4,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Young people shouldn't use vape in the bus unfortunately they do.,3,No,,,,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,5,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Cheaper public transport would help people.
164,35-44,Female,Kings Heath ,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Safer cycle infrastructure and routes,4,Very unlikely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,It’d be great if there was less anti social behaviour on some of the buses,3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
165,55-64,Female,Kings Heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Oppose,"Low traffic neighbourhoods. Adds to journer time, congestion and pollution, in that it increases car journeys so traffic on road for longer and standing still due to congestion. Unfairness in terms of more benefits to those with properties on roads that are blocked. I think it increases speeding in some roads as certain drivers patient ",1,Yes,A few times a year,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I live too far away from where I need to get to,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,I don’t have a need as I walk to work. However. For leisure cycles there are not enough cycle lanes ,2,Very unlikely,No,Never,Costs too much;Unreliable;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,I have not need for public transport,1,Yes,Petrol,No,Unsure of cost effectiveness and reliability of battery life and accessibility to charging points. Also environmental impact of lithium mining but don’t know enough about it,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,2,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not sure,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,"Cheaper public transport and cycle networks need extending. Society needs ro shift regarding cycling… look to Netherlands, Scandi countries- it’s a way of life. It will take generations for us to shift our over reliance on cars "
166,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Oppose measures that just move traffic from side roads to main roads.,2,No,,"At over 70, I don't feel safe on current roads. ",Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Totally protected and connected cycle lanes,4,Somewhat likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,"Reduce fares for vulnerable groups, particularly for all children and anyone on benefits.",3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,5,Only support if reduction is over 50%,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Much greater investment in public transport. Make parking in city centre expensive and unattractive. 
167,35-44,Female,Kings heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,"I strongly support measures to stop cars from parking partially or fully on the footpath rather than the road. It’s hard enough getting around with a pushchair, I can’t imagine how hostile the experience is for people who use wheelchairs.",1,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,"Joined up safe cycle routes. There are bits of cycle path I’d be happy to use, but I need to get from A to B and would have to go on some quite intimidating roads to get to the safer sections. I haven’t cycled for 3 years.",3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Buses are very slow - we need dedicated bus lanes and they need to be properly enforced (probably with automated systems and fines for people who park cars in bus lanes or at bus stops).,1,No,,,,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,5,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,"The policies that work to reduce car use will inevitably be unpopular about motorists because they make driving less convenient. We’re need to implement these policies anyway. And stop endlessly doing consultations. We need decisive action when lives, health and wellbeing are at stake."
168,55-64,Male,Kings Heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Make the roads safer for pedestrians and cyclists by enforcing 20mph speed limits and clamping down on dangerous aggressive and noisey road users. Ltn only makes some of the roads safter for some people. I commute by  cycle everyday ,3,Yes,Almost every day,,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Encouraging cycling by making roads safer by clamping down on the few problem drivers. Encouraging kids to cycle safely to school and  deterring school drop offs ur car. Legalise electric scooters and educate the riders to be safer and more considerate ,4,Somewhat likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Lower fares,3,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Only support if reduction is over 50%,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Very responsible ,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,"
I am not aware of any reduction in air pollution as a result of ltn. It seems  unjust and divisive. It blocks up main roads with traffic so buses are are slower.Its the worst waste of public money and completely ineffective. Making the roads safer by fining dangerouse drivers will pay for itself and encourage cycling. "
169,55-64,Female,Kings Heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,Yes,Difficult walking and cycling due to pain,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,I feel the LTN has been v devisive to our community. I would be very opposed to restrictions for parking on my road. ,3,Yes,A few times a week,Keep falling off!,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,.,4,Somewhat likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel,I don't tend to go to places that buses go to. Also if going into Birmingham I tend to car share with friends to keep costs down,3,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Appears a bit complicated and they are way out of my price range,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,"I think the public transport system is good in my area. I see lots of people walking and cycling.  
I notice some incredibly poor/dangerous driving and feel more should be done to prevent this. These are people who do not follow any rules and selfishly endanger us all. The 20 mph limit is good as it creates smoother easier junctions and a safer environment. 
I found the LTN consultation the most irritating pointless thing, I felt they had their own adjenda and never planned to listen to those people it affected.  "
170,65-74,Female,Moseley ,"£15,000 to £34,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Stop cyclists on pavements,3,No,,Health or mobility issues,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Enforcement of laws- no cycles on pavement ,4,Very likely,No,"Yes, regularly",,Reliability,2,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Not very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Reliable public transport 
171,65-74,Male,Kings Heath,Prefer not to say,No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,"LTNs - it will delay the emergency service (e.g. Ambulances, Fire Engines, Polices, etc) ",2,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Safety. Need more dedicated cycle lanes to school / work areas (offices) & local shops,3,Somewhat likely,Yes,Rarely ,Costs too much;Not practical for my travel,"Fare, frequency, and clean",2,Yes,Hybrid ,Maybe,"Initial cost, Depreciation and driving range",Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,4,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,"More dedicated cycle lanes, better public transport (i.e. cheaper fare, clean and frequency, etc), "
172,75 and older,Male,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,Yes,Difficultly in walking due to Post Polio Syndrome. I need transport if leaving the house.,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,,3,Yes,A few times a year,Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety;Poor Weather,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Better policing of bike theft.,2,Very unlikely,No,Never,Not practical for my travel;Accessibility concerns;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,Higher frequency and less overcrowding.,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Driving range and costly depreciation for a low mileage user.,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,4,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Only support if reduction is over 50%,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,
173,45-54,Female,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",No,No,,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,,3,Yes,"I used to cycle, but not anymore",Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);I live too far away from where I need to get to;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Less traffic ,5,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel,Frequency,2,No,,,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,4,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Cheaper public transport
174,65-74,Male,Kings Heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,No ,1,No,,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Concern about safety;Health or mobility issues,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Cycle lanes ,3,Very likely,Yes,Rarely ,Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,No ,2,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,4,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,More public transportation 
175,35-44,Male,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,Prefer not to say,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,"LTN, creating heavy traffic on main roads leading to more congestion.",3,Yes,A few times a month,I live too far away from where I need to get to;Poor Weather;Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Oppose,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Yes,5,Very likely,Yes,"Yes, regularly",,Night service,3,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cost,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Disagree,Strongly Disagree,5,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,"Reduced traffic near school
zones"
176,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£15,000 to £34,999",Yes,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Blocked off streets only move traffic to other roads which then cause queues of traffic belching out fumes. ,2,No,,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time;I live too far away from where I need to get to;Too old now. ,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,"Obviously fewer cars etc but that is unlikely. 
",4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,"Inconvenient for most of my travel needs, picking up grandchildren and dropping them off at various places. ",Lower costs probably for ordinary people. ,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Worrying about being stranded. ,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,4,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Only support if reduction is over 50%,Not sure,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,I would prefer to see well maintained vehicles and bikes than old vans constantly racing around causing pollution on our streets and roads. 
177,65-74,Female,Kings Heath,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Oppose,Increasing public transport ,1,No,,Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes);Health or mobility issues;Concern about safety,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Increasing bike lanes ,1,Very likely,Yes,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,"Introducing clean, frequent,safe public transport.
Stopping antisocial behaviour on public transport.
Stop littering.",3,Yes,Petrol,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,5,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A small reduction (under 10%) is enough,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,"Introducing cycle lanes.
Making public transport safer."
178,45-54,Male,Kings Heath,Prefer not to say,Yes,No,,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Support,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Local trains will be a huge plus,3,Yes,A few times a year,Inconvenience/ I don't have the time,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,cycle zone,3,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,Rarely ,Not practical for my travel,new train stations,3,Yes,Hybrid ,Maybe,Maybe with time,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,3,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,A moderate reduction (10–20%) is enough,Not sure,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,train travel
179,18-24,Female,Kings heath,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,No,,None of these,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Less traffic meaning it’s safer to cycle when cars are not rushing ,4,Somewhat likely,Yes,Rarely ,More practical to use car rather than travelling to the train station,Cheaper fees,2,No,,,,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,3,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Somewhat responsible ,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Cheaper public transport 
180,55-64,Female,Kings Heath ,"£35,000 to £59,999",No,No,,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Strongly Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,,3,No,,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ",Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Oppose,Neutral,Neutral,Nothing would encourage me to cycle,5,Somewhat unlikely,No,Rarely ,Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,Safety officials ,1,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,In case it ran out of charge ,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,3,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,"I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction","I wouldn’t support this, even with major reduction",Not very responsible ,Neutral,Neutral,Neutral,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Move the LTNs because you now have to drive passed all the local schools and pollute the children 
181,25-34,Female,Kings Heath,"More than £80,000",Yes,No,,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,"Occasionally (e.g. access through friends, rental, or bike share services)","I used to cycle, but not anymore","I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;I live too far away from where I need to get to",Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Neutral,Neutral,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,"Shorter distance to work, having less to carry, roads less congested, less cars parked on curb. ",4,Very likely,Maybe/ Not Sure,"Yes, regularly",,Frequency ,2,Yes,Diesel,Yes,,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,4,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,Very responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Strongly Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Agree,
182,25-34,Female,Moseley,"£60,000 to £79,999",No,No,,Somewhat Oppose,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,,3,Yes,A few times a year,"I have children, other passengers or too much to carry ;Concern about safety;Lack of safe infrastructure (e.g. protected bike lanes)",Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Strongly Support,Somewhat Support,Strongly Support,Neutral,Better infrastructure. There have been too many accidents involving cycles in Moseley and Kings Heath. It is also a through route for HGVs which is too dangerous ,4,Very likely,Yes,Occasionally,Not practical for my travel;Too Crowded;Behaviour of other passengers makes me feel unsafe,Night service and safety,2,Yes,Petrol,Maybe,Cost and infrastructure of charging,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Neutral,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Somewhat Disagree,4,A big reduction (30–50%) is needed,A good reduction (20–30%) is needed,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,I’d support this no matter the pollution reduction,Somewhat responsible ,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Disagree,Neutral,Strongly Agree,Strongly Agree,Somewhat Agree,Somewhat Agree,Strongly Agree,Reduced traffic near schools and better cycling infrastructure