240 13 897 2 5427 document 897 BirminghamServicesEvidenceMapping.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 83f1903d2afbdca8e2437ed7cb125be5 MD5 108332 2018-10-02 12:09:04 http://edata.bham.ac.uk/240/1/BirminghamServicesEvidenceMapping.xlsx 240 1 1 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet spreadsheet public cc_by_4

BirminghamServicesEvidenceMapping.xlsx

data archive 58 disk0/00/00/02/40 2018-10-05 10:08:20 2021-07-20 09:22:27 2021-07-20 09:22:27 data_collection show Leach Joanne M j.leach@bham.ac.uk 0000-0001-7526-624X Birmingam City Council Birmingham City University Aston University University of Warwick Northumbria University 10col_ephy Urban Living Birmingham, Birmingham, Birmingham UK, city, services, city services, evidence mapping, evidence map This spreadsheet catalogues studies about the city of Birmingham, UK, that were used in an evidence mapping analysis. Studies have been selected based upon the following criteria. 1. Take as their subject area all or part of the city of Birmingham UK. 2. Are relevant to the delivery of the city's services, with particular attention paid to those services delivered in all or part by Birmingham City Council (either directly or indicrectly by a third party). This spreadsheet has been prepared by Joanne Leach, j.leach@bham.ac.uk, joanne@joanneleach.co.uk, 07785 792 187, The School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT. The spreadsheet has been prepared as part of the EPSRC-funded Urban Living Birmingham (ULB) research project, grant number EP/P002021/1, http://gow.epsrc.ac.uk/NGBOViewGrant.aspx?GrantRef=EP/P002021/1. 2018-03-01 completed University of Birmingham 10.25500/eData.bham.00000240 Dataset research-data@contacts.bham.ac.uk Department of Civil Engineering epsrc EP/P002021/1 yes yes yes TRUE Researcher and Project Manager Leach Joanne M j.leach@bham.ac.uk pub https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.09.012 IsDescribedBy A spreadsheet was created as follows. 1. Each document was given a unique identifier. 2. Each document was identified as arising from either the policy-related or academic literature. 3. Each document’s primary and secondary area of city service/function focus were recorded as relational topic pairs (e.g., growth and housing, economy and innovation, heritage and conservation, waste and recycling, mobility and accessibility), with the foci arising organically from reviewing the evidence base. The foci were subjected to very little aggregation. 4. Each document’s primary and secondary area of city service/ function focus were aggregated into themes. The themes were those used in the resource-based identification framework. 5. The geographical focus of each document was described as either regional (with specifics listed, such as the West Midlands Combined Authority area), whole city or sub-city (with specifics listed, such as Eastside). Geographical foci were not dis/aggregated to correspond with any official boundaries, such as political boundaries. Literature review of academic and policy-related documents that met the following criteria: - Spoke to the city-services and city-systems challenges that Birmingham, UK, currently faces. Urban services and systems were defined to include ‘soft infrastructure services and systems’ such as education, health, governance and ecosystem services, as well as ‘hard infrastructure services and systems’ such as energy, water, waste, and transport. - Did not predate 2010 unless they remained the most relevant for the city’s current situation. - Were within the political boundary of the city of Birmingham, UK, including some part thereof; i.e., data and documents did not have to reflect the entire city. Included documents comprised the following. - The Birmingham Development Plan (Birmingham City Council, 2013) and those documents and studies that informed it (83 in total) - Academic studies arising from a Web of Science search, topic search: “Birmingham” and within this “UK”, language: English, timespan: 2010-2016. 426 results returned. 262 relevant documents included. - Other documents that adhered to the selection framework (21 in total). en 2016-07-01 2016-12-31 2010-01-01 2017-12-31